Talk:Rajkumar

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Rajkumar (actor) in topic Rajkumar (actor)

Discussion

edit

User:Ncmvocalist is replacing the name Dr. Rajkumar with Rajkumar (actor) in this page without any reason. His change has been undone. Any change made should be discussed and finalised here and only after a consensus is reached, should the change be affected. -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 04:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

There is no valid justification why the common name Rajkumar is automatically directed to this Kannada actor, particularly when there are other notable persons with the same name (eg; Dr. Rajkumar the singer who lives today). Even with a disambiguation page, there is more than one "Dr Rajkumar", which is why the page ought to be moved to Rajkumar (actor), or even, Dr. Rajkumar (actor). The 'Rajkumar' namespace on the other hand should redirect to this disambiguation page. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tsk, tsk. See Gandhi. It is always acceptable to use the most popular usage of a name as the article title and provide links to disambiguation pages, which is what is done with Rajkumar. If you think there are other Rajkumars who are more notable than Dr. Raj, it is your onus to prove it. Till then, stay off -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 10:04, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Tsk tsk, your example is not comparible. Gandhi is considered phenomenal world-wide. You have no proof to ascertain or even justify that the whole namespace of Rajkumar can be occupied by him in the same way. On the other hand, Dr. Rajkumar (actor) is more appropriate and reasonable - a concept you clearly are not accustomed with. It's very simple, you can either learn this concept, or you can embarass yourself when this goes to Rfc. Ncmvocalist (talk) 11:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
How is it not comparable? The name Gandhi relates more to Mahatma Gandhi and the name Rajkumar relates more to Dr. Raj. Your whims and fancies dont apply here. Again, dont threaten me. You are free to file an RfC and I wont get threatened by that. Take your stick elsewhere I am not here to listen to your tomfoolery -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 11:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Dr. Raj is no where near as prominent or as notable as Mahatma Gandhi, or are you in denial? These aren't mere whims and fancies, so don't bother with your nonsensical thoughts. You've already embarassed yourself with your frivolous non-notability tagging of certain articles - I don't care if you like to learn the hard way again. In case you prefer to be more constructive than being a troll, I would suggest you try a google search, or better still, do some research in general. There is no valid justification for the Rajkumar namespace being hogged by an actor. Dr. Rajkumar - possible. Rajkumar - no. Ncmvocalist (talk) 11:37, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I guess you do not know English. I never compared Gandhi with Rajkumar. All I said was was if Gandhi can be redirected to Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, then Rajkumar can as well contain details about Dr. Raj, since there is no other Rajkumar as prominent as Dr. Raj. Nursery English, surprised that you dont understand it and you call yourself an en-5. And by calling me a troll, you have shown to what level you can stoop to forward your POV. I have more than 75 DYKs to my name, so dont question me on my research. You are not worthy enough to call me names, your contributions to Wikipedia are hardly anything... -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 12:01, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
User:Ncmvocalist is just busy with nitpicking here. Dr. Rajkumar is the most popular result one can get for Rajkumar, it's not so complicated to fathom. And by the way, Rajkumar is Rajkumar, not Raj Kumar. So Rajkumar should be and must be redirected to Dr. Rajkumar. Gnanapiti (talk) 15:57, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Rajkumar (disambiguation), you all can sort out the necessary redirects. Mike Cline (talk) 16:11, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply



Raj KumarRajkumar (disambiguation) – Much of the entries here are named Rajkumar, and hence its only appropriate that this be named a dab page. Moreover, confusingly, Rajkumar redirects to the Kannada actor, while Raj Kumar redirects here. We should avoid this and should redirect Raj Kumar to Rajkumar whilst displaying a dab notice in Rajkumar. relisted -Mike Cline (talk) 17:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC) Lynch7 09:21, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment: Yeah! These all names are quite confusing. hence i agree with this disambiguation page. I would suggest that "Raj Kumar" and "Rajkumar" both be redirected to this proposed new named page "Rajkumar (disambiguation)" and "Rajkumar" be renamed to "Rajkumar (Kannada Actor)" and "Raaj Kumar" be renamed to "Raaj Kumar (Hindi Actor)". While editing articles they many times get wrongly hyperlinked. Redirecting Rajkumar and Raj Kumar to disambiguation page atleast doesnt land you on a completely wrong page, but somewhere close.-Animeshkulkarni (talk) 10:16, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Rajkumar (actor) Rajkumar (actor) (talk) 07:25, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Rajkumar - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 14:20, 16 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Rajkumar (actor)

edit

Rajkumar (actor) New Actor Show Name Tu Aashiqui show Rajkumar (actor) (talk) 07:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply