Talk:Rainbow Lounge raid

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

Please help me to add content and Wikify this page. I think the Rainbow Lounge Raid 2009 will go down in LGBT history.

I added a reference from the New York Times. I also deleted a section that at least one editor considered a coatrack issue, but did so mostly because it was unsourced. Wperdue (talk) 16:53, 4 July 2009 (UTC)wperdueReply
Thanks for your help with this article! The New York Times article seems to give a good summary of what has happened so far. There is a new domain that just came out today, but hasn't been uploaded yet www.RainbowLoungeRaid.com Hopefully this will give more central information we can use here. Markg65 (talk) 22:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Changed class to START page. Further events happening in the DFW area may prompt heavier response from the GBLT community. This event is continuing to unfold, and page will need further updates. Wizkid2122 (talk) 19:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

More Potential References edit

Markg65 (talk) 04:43, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Why is this article flagged for deletion? edit

Why is this article flagged for deletion? It meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion.

1) Is the event important or newsworthy?

YES: Multiple major news networks are covering the event, and it touches on strong themes in society such as (unverified) police brutality and (unverified) gay persecution.

2) Does the article site sources?

YES: All major points in the article are sited in the appropriate footnotes.

3) Does the article take a neutral voice?

YES: Though this could be cleaned up a bit, and additional information added, there is no definite bias to the information presented, nor is the tone of the article in first-person, third-person, etc. No "weasel words" are used.

Whoever has marked this article for deletion needs to explain why they have done so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.50.246.246 (talk) 21:39, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Go to the discussion and find out. - ALLSTRecho wuz here 23:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Lack of news coverage edit

Anyone else notice that the main news outlets haven't discussed this news story at all? Why isn't that mentioned in the article? --98.232.181.201 (talk) 08:36, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Because it would be original research ? and we don't do original research. --Cameron Scott (talk) 09:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rainbow Lounge raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rainbow Lounge raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:16, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply