Talk:Radar detector detector

Radar detector detector detector detector?

A radar detector detector detector detector? Is this a joke? --Cirilobeto (talk) 23:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

No, not a joke. Radar detector detectors are used extensively in Virginia and Washington DC as radar detectors are illegal there. They can also be used nationwide to detect commerical drivers using radar detectors, as federal law prohibits the use of radar detectors for vehicles over a certain weight. --Aka042 (talk) 02:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

I think you misread the question. After a radar detector detector(d*2), the article mentions a radar detector detector detector(d*3). The question is about a radar detector detector detector detector(d*4). http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Radar_detector_detector&oldid=242027710 The run-on has been removed from the article since this question was written.R00m c (talk) 07:24, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

The line "due to escalation, the development of the radar-detector-detector-detector-detector-detector was deemed necessary" is now entirely my favorite part of Wikipedia. Please never remove it. Cramyourspam (talk) 01:19, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism?

The spectre IV can NOT detect the beltronics sti, sti-r, or escort 9500ci. I have changed the article to reflect this. This is either someone trying to fool people or blatant lying on stealth micro systems part. Their site claims that it detects all radar detectors certified as of October 2002. The sti, sti-r, and 9500ci were all certified after this date and showed zero emissions on FCC certified testing equipment. The Spectre can not detect these radar detectors because there is no emissions to detect. Spectre IV against sti --99.142.46.213 (talk) 06:04, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Radar detector detector. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100620150944/http://radar.757.org:80/VG2.htm to http://radar.757.org/VG2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:51, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Radar Detector Detector Protector

Given that the article mentions that "adequate shielding" is an easy way to counteract radar detector detectors, I propose that it be mentioned that these shields are, in fact, radar detector detector protectors. 173.2.69.205 (talk) 17:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)