Talk:R. Foster Winans
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 38.140.255.210 in topic Link to wrong Supreme Court case
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Wall Street, the movie.
editI took this out of the article:
- A similar storyline, about a Gatsby-like character (Brant) and his young admirer (Winans), drove Oliver Stone's hit 1987 film, Wall Street, which won Michael Douglas an Academy Award for his portrayal of a rapacious financier named Gordon Gekko.
Is there any evidence of any actual connection, like inspiration? It seems like just a coincidence to me. SnowFire 02:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Link to wrong Supreme Court case
editThe link to: "Carpenter v. United States"
in "Winans' conviction for violating securities law was affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1987 as Carpenter v. United States ..."
links to the wrong "Carpenter v. United States", probably because there are multiple cases with the same name.
It should link to something like: "Carpenter v. United States, 484 U.S. 19 (1987)". Or, maybe it should not be a link at all?
How can we fix this?
Thanks, WikipediaSq (talk) 05:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Casual reader here stopping in to say it got me, too. No need to have a link if Wikipedia doesn't have a page for that case. I ended up following the citation to read the case on Justia. 2603:3012:D00:9C00:B96F:6C04:BE3B:D5EC (talk) 00:35, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Just fixed it :) 38.140.255.210 (talk) 20:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)