Talk:Pushing the Senses

Pushing the Senses was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 21, 2009	Good article nominee	Not listed
February 3, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Former good article nominee

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Alternative music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://web.archive.org/web/20070710223436/http://playlouder.com/feature/+bunchof45s-85/
https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/pop-rock-1.408273
http://roomthirteen.com/features/131/Interview_with_Feeder.html
"The Zutons and Feeder for Welsh festival". NME. 4 April 2006. Retrieved 27 February 2023.

GA Review

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pushing the Senses/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
In the Recording and production section, "Frontman Grant Nicholas said he didn't think the album needed them" ---> "Frontman Grant Nicholas said he did not think the album needed them", per WP:CONTRACTION. Same section, "Grant said the album as a whole does have a retro sound to it, but didn't want to" ---> "Grant said the album as a whole does have a retro sound to it, but did not want to". Same section, ""Tumble and Fall", which became the album's first single, seen Grant describe the recording process as 'old fashioned'", is "seen" the right word? Same section, either add quotations for "...and once said that he don't rate himself as a piano player" or summarize the quote in your own words. In the Songs section, "Tumble and Fall", the third track on Pushing the Senses, was chosen as its lead single because the band didn't want to start off" ---> "Tumble and Fall", the third track on Pushing the Senses, was chosen as its lead single because the band did not want to start off". Same section, ""Tumble and Fall" and left off the album as the band felt it wouldn't fit in with its general feel" ---> ""Tumble and Fall" and left off the album as the band felt it would not fit in with its general feel".

Done Spiderone 16:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
In the lead, it might be best to link "United Kingdom" once. Also in the lead and throughout the article, "Q Magazine" ---> "Q magazine". Throughout the article, link "Fran Healy", "mixing", and "PIAS" to their correspondence articles. In the Recording and production section, the quote in the third paragraph is far too large, see WP:MOSQUOTE. The quote in the Songs section is long as well. "The song was written at home, as soon as I had that intro, the vocal “woo who” bit – what ever you want to call it – that was a really important hook for the song" ---> "The song was written at home, as soon as I had that intro, the vocal 'woo who' bit – what ever you want to call it – that was a really important hook for the song." Also, the hyphens needs to be dashes. In the Critical reception section, "Feeder are in danger of being a schizophrenic band, unrecognisable from their once “trademark” sound and prone to style swings on a whim" ---> "Feeder are in danger of being a schizophrenic band, unrecognisable from their once 'trademark' sound and prone to style swings on a whim". Same section, italicize "The Guardian" and "Kerrang!", since one is a newspaper and the other is a magazine. Same section, you might want to remove "well-known", since its a peacock term. Same section, in the BBC review, the songs "Feeling A Moment", "Tumble And Fall", "Pilgrim Soul", and "Pushing the Senses" should not be in quotations withing a quote, instead they should be 'Feeling A Moment', 'Tumble And Fall', 'Pilgrim Soul', and 'Pushing the Senses'.

Done Spiderone 16:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
There's six dead links. The link titles in References 9, 23, 26, and 28 are not supposed to be in all capitals, per here. In the lead, the Q magazine comment, "finally establish Feeder as major league players", the source should be mentioned after the quote has concluded, per here. The Guardian, Teraz Rock, and Billboard need to be italicized in the source.

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:
Are Feeder Scrap Book, Toazted.com, Faceculture, and Rocklist.net reliable sources?

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
File:Pushing The Senses.jpg has a weak FUR.

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
This article is in need of a lot of work. But, if the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:24, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've decided to fail the article, since its a week since the GA review. If the statements above can be addressed, then the article may be renominated for GA. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:01, 21 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

For the album cover image, File:Pushing The Senses.jpg, I've replaced the existing fair use rationale with a new one using the "album cover fur" template, which should address that concern. — Mudwater^(Talk) 20:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pushing the Senses/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Blackjacks101 (talk) 22:58, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hey sorry, but I must quick fail this article for a number of reasons....

1. There is no references in the Charts section

2. Many MOS issues, especially the Songs section, Tracklisting etc

3. Prose Issues such as "In an interview with the bands official website Feederweb," (band's)

Sorry, but this article needs a lot of work --Blackjacks101 (talk) 22:58, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Pushing the Senses. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic