Talk:Project Runway

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Project Runway/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Start-class from LGBT project. HIgh-importance within fashion because it's very successful and has spawned a UK version. Daniel Case 17:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 17:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Article WP:OR

I have tagged each of the articles contestant progress chart with "{{Original research|table}}" for the following reasons:

1. Stating a contestant did HIGH or LOW in almost all of the cases is WP:Original Research. In the show, aside from some cases where the host makes it clear who made it to the top, the presenter does not explicitly say who did bad and who did good.
2. A reliable source, including the source material, can not be provided where it states which contestants placement was; Top or Bottom.
3. To infer that most of these contestants are the Top/Bottom, one must interpret from the source material's comments about their performance, about how they did and decide if they did good or bad. Since not everyone's perspectives are the same, there is not a 100% way to WP:Verify this information.

Proposal

• Remove all of the unsourced HIGHs and LOWs that have to be interpreted from the source material and leave the ones that the presenter clearly states are in the Top/Bottom, which would not leave many in each respective seasons.

— Presented by Chase (talk) 14:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

In the show, after the judges interview the 6 designers they brought back, they have their little "private" discussion, and here it is clear who placed where, as Heidi uses langage like "Let's talk about the designers we liked", or "let's talk about the designers at the bottom". I don't think it's OR most of the time. --MASEM (t) 14:42, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Project Runway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081020043626/http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/10/lifetime_wants_project_runway.php to http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/10/lifetime_wants_project_runway.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091015065537/http://www.mylifetime.com/on-tv/shows/project-runway/project-runway-all-star-challenge to http://www.mylifetime.com/on-tv/shows/project-runway/project-runway-all-star-challenge

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

"Future" Seasons

This section is now mostly about previous seasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.233.65.5 (talk) 02:47, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Media Franchise

IMO, this article has evolved into information on a media franchise rather than information on just the series Project Runway. My recommendation is to significantly edit down the information here and create a new article dedicated to Project Runway only.

Denise B-K (talk) 08:19, 7 December 2019 (UTC)denisebk

Requested move 11 October 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus is not a vote. User:No such user provides cogent analysis of the pages—as of this close, the pages still are substantively as described. The proposed splits and merges can be boldly done or further discussed here or if needed, at the WikiProjects. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 00:06, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

---

• Project Runway → Project Runway (American TV series)
• Project Runway (franchise) → Project Runway

– To make consistency with the originator of the show and its franchise as with the other reality TV franchises. ApprenticeWiki ^work 11:43, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

• Support per nom. You might wanna move all seasons of the show. Shwcz (talk) 11:58, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:15, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• Oppose. Has anyone, like, take a look a the articles? The current Project Runway is a detailed, prose-ladden article which also covers all the spin-offs and the video game. The other article is nothing but a list of international adaptations in a tabular format, has a single sentence of prose, and does not even mention the history and spin-offs. That is not a proper franchise article, despite the name. Rename the latter to List of international Project Runway adaptations instead, because that is what it is. Readers are much better served with the current main article. No such user (talk) 10:08, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

  P.S. Instead, please consider the Denisebk's suggestion from #Media Franchise above: split the detailed season overviews into a separate article, and merge the table from Project Runway (franchise) here, and you get a proper franchise overview. Moving the articles as nominated would be putting the cart before the horse. No such user (talk) 10:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Judging

OMG. You are so economically driven for this show. Can't believe you kept the self efoKovid he's all about trying to make people sorry for him and he has NO skill. Get rid of him. He does not drive audiences to watch the show. He makes us sick! 2601:985:A82:4600:D947:2D28:BD2B:F2EB (talk) 01:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)