Talk:Prince discography

Singles

I noticed a column was added for the United World Chart, which is great. However, of all the Prince singles, there is chart information for one song - "Sign O the Times". Soooo either this column is completely unnecessary or there is missing chart data. All other songs have dashes. Anyone have an idea what's up? - eo 12:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

A vandal inflated a bunch of chart positions and when correcting these I removed the UWC column. It served no purpose. - eo 22:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Sales Figures

The sales figures on this page were horribly inflated. Sadly, they are hard to cite because there are not a lot of complete sources online for these figures. For the moment, I have updated much the album sales data based on info compiled here: http://www.ukmix.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=34161 The figures on this page are compiled from RIAA, Billboard, Soundscan, etc... However, since it's a forum listing it's not an appropriate "official" source. We need something better. If someone were so inclined they could probably dig through that thread for some valid citations on at least a few of the numbers. --John T. Folden 07:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

The RIAA lists the certified sales at 20.5 million. Nowhere near the 48.9 currently listed. The worldwide sales sound extremely inflated as well. Most US-based artists sell the bulk of their records in the US. I personally like his music, but the numbers listed are really wishful thinking. https://www.riaa.com/gold-platinum/?tab_active=top_tallies&ttt=TAA#search_section Sirpent (talk) 20:47, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Irresistible Bitch? And where's Automatic?

The singles list seems to list the b-side Irresistible Bitch for some reason, and omits Automatic which was released in Australia... Lianachan

Fair-use on discographies test case

Please see Talk:The_Beatles_discography#Poll_on_the_use_of_fair-use_images_on_this_page_and_the_interpretation_of_policy which is acting as a test case in this matter. Jooler 09:42, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Organization of albums

Because Prince's body of work is so prolific, I organized his albums into the subcategories of: Studio, Soundtracks, New Power Generation & Instrumental, Live, and Compilations. This model is loosely inspired by other large discographies, such as U2's or Madonna's. My edit was reverted, and it was requested that I start a discussion first. Do others agree or disagree on the organization of albums?

Disagree - for several reasons, including:

a) It ruins the chronological progression of the discography. A person new to Prince's body of work would assume, at first glance, that Sign O' The Times was a follow up to Around The World In A Day which was in turn a follow up to 1999, etc.

b) While several of Prince's albums also happen to serve as soundtracks, they very much are considered stand-alone works both in general perception and in artistic merit. To place Purple Rain and Parade in the same category with Girl 6 shows, to me, a very clear misunderstanding of these albums. I'd argue this is, also, not comparable to Madonna's or U2's discographies in this regard because the soundtracks listed there are, truly, works containing music from various artists unconnected with them and exist only for the movies in question - thereby making them less than 'official' albums. The same can not be said for Purple Rain, Parade, Graffiti Bridge.

c) Sub-categories such as "Instrumental" or "Live" seem spurious at best given that many of Prince's albums contain a mix of studio, live and instrumental all on one disc.

d) This categorical information, should someone want it, is already included in the Additional Info column of the listing.

However, a couple of notes here. Girl 6 is not a Prince album in the classic sense. It is a true soundtrack compiled by someone else. Also, it is questionable to include, at least the first two, New Power Generation releases in the main discography. They are no more official Prince albums than the first 2 or 3 produced under "The Time" moniker (where Prince and a couple of his own bandmates actually composed/performed on the entire album). Compilations are also an iffy category as Prince himself often seemed to have little directly to do with them. --John T. Folden 05:46, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

I agree: this discography is a mess! The various categories makes it confuse and as stated above by John, it's totally unappropriate to separate the soundtracks, instrumental and live albums. On the other hand, Crystal Ball and The Vault... Old Friends 4 Sale were original studio albums (many Prince album were made out of various sessions that were reworked or compiled at a later date, not only these 2, so there's little point f any in separating them from the bulk). Girl 6, on the other hand, belongs to the compilation category alongsite The Hits/The B-Sides, The Very Best Of and Ultimate. I'll add that a discography should include side-projects such as the NPG albums, Madhouse, Jill Jones, etc. Prince's body of work cannot be fully apprehended if only the "Prince" albums are taken into account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.162.191.114 (talk) 03:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Prince.eye.gif

Image:Prince.eye.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Chart positions/not released

I've not checked the discography pages of other artists, but should there be some distinction between singles which failed to chart in particular countries and singles which weren't released in them? From looking at the current page, you can't tell if (for example) America didn't chart in the UK, or simply wasn't released there (pedants - it was the latter, I know). Lianachan (talk) 19:43, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Covers and songs written for other artists

This article could do with a section of songs written by prince and made famous/recorded by others. Chaka Khan's "I Feel For You" which has it's own wiki page doesn't get a mention and I am sure there are other significant omissions. Sorry for requesting work I'm not ready to take on myself but hoping a fan likes my suggestion Pete the pitiless (talk) 13:05, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

missing album

New Power Soul. It's a regular album no import or anything weird. 1998. Should be on the list —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.23.111.178 (talk) 14:16, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

It's not included because the album is credited to the New Power Generation, not Prince. MaJic Talk 2 Me. I'll Listen. 00:03, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Video Organization

Is it possible to organize the videos into albums and whatnot? I know several of the videos are not really commercial and promo-intended, but are part of specials, performances and whatnot. Thank you. MaJic Talk 2 Me. I'll Listen. 00:05, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Prince discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131105082230/http://www.infodisc.fr:80/Artiste_Ventes.php to http://www.infodisc.fr/Artiste_Ventes.php
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120225041920/http://www.musiccanada.com/GPSearchResult.aspx?st= to http://www.musiccanada.com/GPSearchResult.aspx?st=&ica=False&sa=prince&sl=&smt=0&sat=-1&ssb=Cert.%20Date

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:44, 5 May 2016 (UTC)