This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was no move. Not enough interest one way or another for the to be a consensus for move. I suggest that if a new request is made that the requester makes it using reliable sources and arguments based on WP:AT and the naming conventions -- PBS (talk) 15:23, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Ponte metálica de Fão → ? – Request made 30 August 2012 by user:Bonifácio using template:movenotice. Reason given by Bonifácio is "Any english language user that tries to find [this bridge] will search by it's english words - Fão Bridge" -- PBS (talk) 14:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Any english language user that tries to find Ponte metálica de Fão will search by it's english words - Fão Bridge. The term metallic is redundant, because there's no other bridge on the area Bonifácio (talk) 13:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- @Bonifácio, Hi, but why would any English-speaker search for this bridge? It is non-notable and unknown in English sources. Whatever we title it "Fao Bridge" "Bridge at Fao" etc. will still hit the article. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- Move to Ponte de Fão "metálica" is redundant, and will bring it into line with the pt.wp article and bulk of Category:Bridges in Portugal format, this bridge being nothing special. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.