Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
| WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels | (Rated Project-class) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
|
Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Some reference sitesEdit
Just ran across this list here: http://www.siue.edu/CCRU/websites.htm
- http://www.bizave.com/portland/bridges
- http://william-king.www.drexel.edu/top/bridge/CB1.html
- http://www.howstuffworks.com/bridge.htm
- http://pghbridges.com
- http://www.virtualvermont.com/coveredbridge
- http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/bridge/build.html
- http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist4/calbridges.htm
- http://www.mnhs.org/places/nationalregister/bridges/bridges.html
- http://www.icomos.org/studies/bridges.htm
Bixby Creek Bridge listed at Requested movesEdit
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Bixby Creek Bridge to be moved to Bixby Bridge. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Project-independent quality assessmentsEdit
Quality assessments are used by Wikipedia editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:41, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Proposed refactoring of geographic feature notabilityEdit
We are discussing a proposal to refactor the guidelines for geographic feature notability. Please feel free to join in the discussion of this proposal. — hike395 (talk) 03:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
I-35W Mississippi River bridge is at GAR.Edit
FYI, I-35W Mississippi River bridge was sent to GAR. Not sure why this project was not notified. Dave (talk) 21:46, 22 April 2023 (UTC)