A fact from Pico Canyon Oilfield appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 August 2008, and was viewed approximately 3,841 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
2 of 3 NRHP photos linked in article are identified NPS photos, hence public domain and can be used. The first one is unclear, but may possibly be assumed to be NPS and usable.
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've noticed that in this article, the word "Oilfield" is used in the title, but nowhere else. However, in the references and in the article, oil field is used much more, and is in the references. Does anyone think that we should move the article to a new title, or change the use of the word oilfield in the article?Kuro ♪22:40, 2 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
I bumped it to start, but I actually think its b-class now, consensus says ....