Talk:Peter Cazalet

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Peter Cazalet be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Requested move 24 March 2015

Latest comment: 9 years ago8 comments6 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move. Cúchullain ^t/c 14:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Peter Cazalet → ? – This Royal Navy officer is not the primary topic of the same name. The racehorse trainer is not a primary topic either. Shall he be disambiguated as "Royal Navy", "Royal Navy officer", or "officer"? --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 21:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC) George Ho (talk) 03:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Peter Cazalet (military) , Peter Cazalet (admiral) , or Peter Cazalet (navy) (Fixed typo for you. --George Ho (talk) 05:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)) -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:40, 24 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Comment: I don't follow why the move is needed but, if it is needed, then the correct disambiguation should be Peter Cazalet (Royal Navy officer). Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 21:49, 24 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Dormskirk: Per WP:primary topic, this military personnel is no more significant or popular than the racehorse trainer. Agree? --George Ho (talk) 07:15, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. Given there's only two of them and the RN officer was a knighted admiral I don't think there's any need for a change. But if change is decided, then it should indeed be Peter Cazalet (Royal Navy officer), the standard disambiguator for RN officers. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Support (Royal Navy officer) looks like a 60/40 WP:TWODABS from books. Not serving readers by not having a mobile friendly dab. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Oppose In spite of the comparative length of the two articles, the naval officer looks like the slightly more important figure, not sure I follow about mobile friendly dabs. PatGallacher (talk) 15:23, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic