Talk:Peru at the 2010 Winter Olympics

Peru at the 2010 Winter Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 13, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Peru Low‑importance

This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Peru To-do:

Assess and prioritise articles (log)
Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate
Create:
Expand: new articles; top importance articles
FAC / FLC: Peru national football team
GAN:
Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture
Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes
Translate: National University of San Marcos
Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive
Wikify: articles needing attention

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Peru at the 2010 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 07:12, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Going to take up this review. MWright96 (talk) 07:12, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Background edit

"and with the exception of the 1952 Helsinki Games has participated" - a comma is needed between "Games" and "has"

Alpine skiing edit

"but she failed to finish" - completed to avoid reptition of closely spelt wording
"finishing the first run in a time of 59 seconds, but failing to finish the second run." - end again to avoid reptition

Cross-country skiing edit

"and moving from Peru to Seattle, Washington" - sentence needs a period to complete it
"he finished with a time of 45 minutes and 53 seconds, finishing in 94th place out of 95 competitors." - placing 94th

References edit

Reference 2 should have its publication and access dates should be written as 13 February 2010 and 24 July 2011 in line with the rest of the citations

That is all I found during my read-through. Like the other reviews, not too many issues are present. MWright96 (talk) 08:47, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

@MWright96: thanks for another review, I've fixed all the points raised. Courcelles (talk) 10:22, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
- @Courcelles: Can now promote this entry to GA class. Note: I've made an edit to fix the inconsistency with the date formatting in the references. MWright96 (talk) 11:59, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic