Talk:Pawtucket/Central Falls station

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pawtucket/Central Falls station article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Greater Boston Public Transit Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Greater Boston Public Transit WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of public transportation in the Greater Boston metropolitan area. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Greater Boston Public TransitWikipedia:WikiProject Greater Boston Public TransitTemplate:WikiProject Greater Boston Public TransitGreater Boston Public Transit articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Rhode Island Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Rhode Island portal This article is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island (assessed as Low-importance).

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Link archiving edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

@Pi.1415926535: Greetings! Regarding this revert...I was trying to figure out what "FRIP" means, but the reference following it was giving me a 404. Adding an archive link makes that source accessible to readers, and IABot does that automatically for all links. (Unfortunately that term doesn't seem to appear in the referenced source.) This revert breaks that citation again. Archiving links is a pretty standard operation that makes sure the links stay working permanently. Not sure what the downside would be? -- Beland (talk) 05:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Beland: Archiving a bunch of live links makes the article harder to edit (by increasing the length of the wikitext) and less reader-friendly (by adding extra text to the citations). When a single citation needs archiving, it's best to do so manually, as I just did (I also believe IABot has a setting to ignore live links). I know it's a tiny bit extra work to do manually, but it's better to keep articles free of clutter.

FRIP apparently stands for Freight Rail Improvement Project (see here, for example), the project under which the dedicated freight track was installed. I don't think the acronym meaning is particularly pertinent here - all that's really relevant to the station is that the track exists - but I've put it in quotes to indicate that it's a named track. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:19, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

It does not seem that IABot was able to actually tell the difference between live and dead links, and links can go dead at any time. The content of web pages can also change without the link going dead, but the new content might not support the referenced claim. So I think the additional parameters, though a bit more of an eyeful for editors, are worth it for readers. -- Beland (talk) 06:39, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic