Talk:Paulamys

Latest comment: 7 months ago by ModernDayTrilobite in topic Requested move 4 October 2023

Requested move 4 October 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus that no single vernacular name is the WP:COMMONNAME, and thus that the scientific name is a preferable article title. (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 14:48, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


Flores long-nosed ratPaulamys – This animal has no common name, this name has been only used twice in the academic literature [1], Paulamys is much more common and should be the default when there is no common name. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:28, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • Support. Scientific name is more commonly used than "Flores long-nosed rat" (or another vernacular name, "Paula's long-nosed rat"). There is unlikely to be a single English vernacular name that is more commonly used than the scientific name for any organism that: a) doesn't occur in an English speaking country, b) was relatively recently determined to be a distinct species by scientists, and c) which belongs to a group of organisms (rodents) considered uncharismatic by the general public. It is is not Wikipedia's place to put it's thumb on the scale and attempt to popularize a vernacular name that is not commonly used. Plantdrew (talk) 01:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.