This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
<nowiki>@Robert McClenon and Sulfurboy:</nowiki/>
Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals says
"Authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals: The person's work (or works) has: ... (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums."
What more do I need to show? --Montwriter (talk) 21:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
I went through it and I think it's good to go. Moving to mainspace. Montanabw(talk) 17:33, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Montanabw and Montwriter: As I said before, no argument from me that Harris is notable. I still have problems with some of the references and note, in particular, that ref 1 (now moved into the lede against the usual policy that the lede summarizes info with citations in the body so should not contain citations itself) is just an image with no context that supports the statement best known for his life-sized stuffed and upholstered female figures which I had copied from the body in order to make a more conventional lede.
But now the article is in mainspace where it belongs and other editors may be able to contribute to it. Does it need a maintenance tag? Too dependent on local coverage, too dependent on primary sources? It's not yet verified that the references support the statements they are attached to? — jmcgnh(talk)(contribs) 18:44, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
