This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Normandy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Normandy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NormandyWikipedia:WikiProject NormandyTemplate:WikiProject NormandyNormandy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
“Old Norman was the principal administrative language of the Principality of Antioch…” : This assertion is questionable. The Principality of Antioch was created by Bohemond de Hauteville, a Norman, but was not a Norman principality. The population of Antioch was composed of Greeks, Armenians and indigenous people. The principal administrative language of the Principality was probably Latin (and/or Greek). -- G. Calabria (talk) 15:25, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I removed this concoction from the article. It is really hard to beleave Old Norman could be an administrative language. I found the cited book, and it doesn't contain this statement. On the page 67 of Crusades: The Illustrated History edited by Thomas F. Madden we read:
„French was the dominant tongue in the kingdom of Jerusalem, with Latin used for legal and ecclesiastical purposes. The county of Tripoli used Provençal and the Norman dialect was important in the principality Antioch.“
And it is all. The word important doesn't mean principal (as in the earlier variant) or administrative. — Albert Krantz¿? 13:32, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
