Talk:Old Croghan Man

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2020 and 5 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): E.k.robinson.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Corn in ancient Ireland?

From the text: Other theories suggest that Old Croghan Man and other bog bodies were sacrifices to gods of fertility or harvest,[2] and killed and buried to ensure good yields of corn

My point is that corn didn't exist in Ireland at the time he was killed. Corn comes from South America and was only introduced after European expeditions just a few hundred years ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.191.112.210 (talk) 16:22, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

This is a fair point. I've applied a quick DAB/fix to the more generic "cereals" term. That whole sentence has been uncited for a while however, and either needs a proper cite (or to be removed). Guliolopez (talk) 16:53, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

In Ireland and the UK "corn" is a catch all term for grain - Oats, Wheat, Barley etc. This is probably the cause of confusion here - as an Irishman the usage here would not have caused me to think of American corn which we would call Maize — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.250.0.49 (talk) 05:45, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Contradiction

The two main sources provided seem to contradict each other on an important point. The "Mirror" source suggests that the damage to the nipples occurred before death and is indicative of torture. The "National Geographic" source reads "Arm wounds suggested he had tried to fend off a knife before he was fatally stabbed in the heart. Then his body had been oddly mutilated—his nipples apparently cut" - suggesting a post-mortem mutilation. Further texts are less clear cut, and put forward (a more balanced) view of multiple possible causes. (ante-mortem torture by attackers, post-mortem mutilation for symbolic reasons, or just post-mortem degradation in the bog). Whatever the case, the current text should probably be tempered to reflect the lack of certainty. Unless there are any other opinions (possibly more informed on the subject than I), I'm going to update to address these issues. Guliolopez (talk) 15:38, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Any comments on the above before I review to see if these issues can be addressed? Guliolopez (talk) 11:57, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

I myself have no objections. Make it so. AlecTrevelyan402(Click Here to leave a message)

 Done Guliolopez (talk) 16:01, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

photo to add

here is the link to the photo if anyone can add it. http://www.flickr.com/photos/knobil/2048845714/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gizziiusa (talk • contribs) 03:25, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

We cannot upload images from Flickr that have that sort of license. Please read this for the guidelines. --GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 13:42, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly vandalism?

"...and noted for the "gel" found in his hair.[1]" this needs to be sourced and / or expanded, or simply removed as vandalism" any author have a position on removing this phrase?

The sentence that you are referring to is about the Clonycavan Man. If you do research via the internet, I assure you that you will find many to describe the mummy's hair gel. --GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 13:38, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Irish name

Can somebody please verify the Irish Name Seanfhear Chruacháin for Old Croghan Man. --Bullenwächter (talk) 08:02, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

It seems wrong to me - it translates as "Old man from Croghan" - I had always assumed the townland he was found in was Old Croghan, so it should instead be "Man from Old Croghan". In English "Old Croghan Man" is ambiguous - could mean old man from Croghan or man from Old Croghan, whereas in Irish it's definitely the former. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.250.0.49 (talk) 05:40, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

The locality may correctly be "Oldcroghan". Although seen mostly as "Old Croghan" in online articles, in the museum where the body is exhibited, it's labeled as "Oldcroghan Man". Similarly in this article: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/01/0117_060117_irish_bogmen.html 160.111.254.17 (talk) 17:17, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Old Croghan Man. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100905054317/http://www.sciencespin.com/magazine/archive/2007/01/irish-bogs-reveal-bodies-and-books- to http://www.sciencespin.com/magazine/archive/2007/01/irish-bogs-reveal-bodies-and-books-/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120316204336/http://excavations.ie/Pages/Details.php?Year=2003&County=Offaly&id=10362 to http://excavations.ie/Pages/Details.php?Year=2003&County=Offaly&id=10362
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110815225133/http://excavations.ie/Pages/Details.php?Year=2003&County=Offaly&id=10361 to http://excavations.ie/Pages/Details.php?Year=2003&County=Offaly&id=10361
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110815225557/http://excavations.ie/Pages/Details.php?Year=2004&County=Offaly&id=12348 to http://excavations.ie/Pages/Details.php?Year=2004&County=Offaly&id=12348

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)