Wikipedia

Talk:Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Spintendo in topic Inaccurate information
Learn more about this page

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Inaccurate information edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I currently work at the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology and therefore have a conflict of interest. I'm highlighting a couple of areas where content on this page is incorrect. We'd like to have the content of this page updated accordingly. Please let me know if there are any questions or concerns.

Edit request

Mission section is not correct/outdated. The latest information about ONC, including its vision, mission, and strategic goals are listed here: [1]

Programs section is not correct/outdated. Its content highlights FORMER programs so that needs to be clarified. The only “program” we have now is the ONC Health IT Certification Program [2]. Beyond that, our work centers around standards development and the implementation of the 21st Century Cures Act provisions in section 4000. [3] [4] [5]

Advisory committees section is not correct/outdated. There is only one Health Information Technology Advisory Committee (HITAC) now. [6] [7]

References

  1. ^ https://www.healthit.gov/topic/about-onc
  2. ^ https://www.healthit.gov/topic/certification-ehrs/certification-health-it
  3. ^ https://www.healthit.gov/topic/laws-regulation-and-policy/health-it-legislation
  4. ^ https://ehrintelligence.com/news/which-provisions-of-the-21st-century-cures-act-has-onc-implemented
  5. ^ https://www.healthit.gov/topic/laws-regulation-and-policy/notice-proposed-rulemaking-improve-interoperability-health
  6. ^ https://www.healthit.gov/hitac/committees/health-information-technology-advisory-committee-hitac
  7. ^ https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2017/11/17/new-members-serve-health-information-technology-advisory-committee.html

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt Heim (talk • contribs) 19:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reply 24-SEP-2019 edit

   Unable to implement  

  • Your edit request could not be implemented because the provided references are not formatted correctly.[a] The citation style predominantly used by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology article is Citation Style 1 (CS1). The citation style used in the edit request consists of bare URL's.[b] Any requested edit of yours which may be implemented will need to resemble the current style already in use in the article – in this case, CS1. (See WP:CITEVAR.) In the extended section below titled Citation style, I have illustrated two examples: one showing how the edit request was submitted, and another showing how requests should be submitted in the future:
Citation style
Bare URL reference formatting:

The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles,[1] while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.[2] The Sun's temperature is 5,778 Kelvin.[3]

References

1. https://www.booksource.com
2. http://www.journalsource.com
3. http://www.websource.com

In the example above there are three URL's provided with the claim statements, but these URL's have not been placed using Citation Style 1, which is the style predominantly used by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology article. Using this style, the WikiFormatted text should resemble the following:

Citation Style 1 formatting:

The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles,<ref>{{cite book|last1=Sjöblad|first1=Tristan|title=The Sun|url=http://www.booksource.com|publisher=Academic Press|date=2019|page=1}}</ref> while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Harinath|first1=Paramjit|title=Size of the Moon|journal=Science|issue=78|volume=51|url=http://www.journalsource.com|date=2019|page=46}}</ref> The Sun's temperature is 5,778 Kelvin.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Uemura|first1=Shu|title=The Sun's Heat|url=http://www.websource.com|publisher=Academic Press|date=2019|page=2}}</ref>

Which displays as:

The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles,[1] while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.[2] The Sun's temperature is 5,778 Kelvin.[3]

References

  1. ^ Sjöblad, Tristan. The Sun. Academic Press, 2019, p. 1.
  2. ^ Harinath, Paramjit. (2019). "Size of the Moon", Science, 51(78):46.
  3. ^ Uemura, Shū. The Sun's Heat. Academic Press, 2019, p. 2.


Notes

  1. ^ The fault for this formatting error may have originated with the automated prompts used by the edit request template, which asks for a COI editor to "supply the URL of any references used". While the resulting omission of information would not be the fault of the requesting COI editor, it nevertheless remains their responsibility to supply the references formatted in the style used by the article.
  2. ^ The use of bare URLs as references is a style which is acceptable for use in Wikipedia. However, general practice dictates that the style already in use for an article be the one that is subsequently used for all future additions unless changed by editorial consensus.[1]

References

  1. ^ "WP:CITEVAR - Wikipedia:Citing sources". Wikipedia. 20 October 2018. Retrieved 22 October 2018. Guideline: It is normal practice to defer to the style used by the first major contributor or adopted by the consensus of editors already working on the page, unless a change in consensus has been achieved. If the article you are editing is already using a particular citation style, you should follow it.

In the example above the references have been formatted according to Citation Style 1, which shows the author, the source's name, date, etc., all information which is lost when only the links are provided. As Wikipedia is a volunteer project, edit requests such yours are generally expected to have this formatting done before the request is submitted for review.

Kindly resubmit the edit request below at your earliest convenience, taking care to ensure that it makes use of CS1. If you have any questions about this formatting please don't hesitate to ask myself or another editor. Regards,  Spintendo  20:32, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Office_of_the_National_Coordinator_for_Health_Information_Technology&oldid=1204396080"