Talk:Nevada Test and Training Range (military unit)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://afhra.maxwell.af.mil/rso/rso_index.html
  • In Hamilton Air Force Base on 2011-03-22 19:58:15, 404 Not Found
  • In Hamilton Air Force Base on 2011-04-18 04:46:30, 404 Not Found
  • In 13th Bomb Squadron on 2011-05-23 02:58:17, 404 Not Found
  • In 17th Training Wing on 2011-05-25 02:00:51, 404 Not Found
  • In 1st Troop Carrier Group on 2011-05-25 06:54:14, 404 Not Found
  • In 13th Bomb Squadron on 2011-06-01 15:07:57, 404 Not Found
  • In 17th Training Wing on 2011-06-01 22:26:07, 404 Not Found
  • In 18th Operations Group on 2011-06-02 00:26:19, 404 Not Found
  • In 1st Troop Carrier Group on 2011-06-10 04:31:19, 404 Not Found
  • In 4th Fighter Wing on 2011-06-19 14:16:37, 404 Not Found
  • In 543d Tactical Support Group on 2011-06-19 20:10:31, 404 Not Found
  • In 98th Range Wing on 2011-06-19 21:51:32, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:52, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was not moved. --BDD (talk) 21:06, 29 January 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

98th Range Wing → Nevada Test and Training Range – Retitle article per WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME. Prior discussion and consensus is at Talk:Nevada Test and Training Range (Geographic area). Requested target page is redirect (and former name for article now including Geographic area in its title) preventing the move.--Lineagegeek (talk) 16:28, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

See discussion at Nevada Test and Training Wing, which has been reverted to that title, as well.--Lineagegeek (talk) 23:10, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

• Oppose the target is now a different article. And in any case, the geographic area is the primary topic, not the unit. -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 23:51, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose. The range was and is the primary use. The unit has had many name changes. To make it the primary topic seems rather foolish. If this really need renaming, then the best option could be Nevada Test and Training (wing) which would follow normal dab conventions. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:00, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose Suggested Best Option My preferred option would be to make the Nevada Test and Training Range a disambiguation page and channel people to their preferred option Nevada Test and Training Range (noun) or Nevada Test and Training Range (other noun). I don't agree that the primary decision is as clear cut as others believe in view of the 98th's distinguished history. However, I concede that sentiment favors the installation being regarded as primary. The suggested option for this page, Nevada Test and Training (wing) doesn't follow, since Range is part of the unit name. I'd like to see a better option (before we all start saying nasty things about the genius in DAF/A1M who came up with the new name for the wing).--Lineagegeek (talk) 00:10, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
• Comment Why not call the installation the 'Nevada Test and Training Range (installation 2001-2012)'? Buckshot06 (talk) 00:51, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose The current proposal doesn't make sense, but I do support moving this page to XXX (unit) and the other one to XXX (range) or something like that. As it stands now, we could then create a disambiguation page at the old location, and go from there. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:14, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Nevada Test and Training Range (military unit). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130220102021/http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=9856 to http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=9856
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130217021903/http://www.nellis.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=18506 to http://www.nellis.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=18506
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130313135105/http://www.afhra.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-090529-038.pdf to http://www.afhra.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-090529-038.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130313135129/http://www.afhra.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-090529-039.pdf to http://www.afhra.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-090529-039.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130313135153/http://www.afhra.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-090529-040.pdf to http://www.afhra.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-090529-040.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130313135213/http://www.afhra.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-090529-041.pdf to http://www.afhra.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-090529-041.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)