Talk:Neil Mitchell (radio presenter)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Removed Line edit
Removed line "Victorian State MLC Bernie Finn has said "Neil Mitchell does not like Catholics very much".[1]" since it's completely out of place and irrelevant.110.33.182.45 (talk) 06:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Hardly NPOV edit
This article could have been written by his radio station's PR department. Hardly a negative mentioned. It's like the man is a saint. We are told he "has used his considerable profile and influence...to make positive changes." I personally regard him as a populist (rather than popular) shock jock who panders to his audience's prejudices to do considerable damage to fairness and equality in our society. Sure, that's my opinion and it's not encyclopaedic, but I'm not alone. Let's get some balance into the article. HiLo48 (talk) 08:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Totally concur. This article reads like Mitchell's PR team wrote it. Needs more research and a more balanced approach. Dunks (talk) 11:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018) edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Neil Mitchell (radio presenter). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130510151454/http://www.theweeklyreview.com.au/well-read-article-display/A-matter-of-opinion/5116 to http://www.theweeklyreview.com.au/well-read-article-display/A-matter-of-opinion/5116
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140322043328/http://www.melbournepressclub.com/quills/2013/best-radio-current-affairs-report/neil-mitchell_radio-3aw-melbourne-pty-ltd to http://www.melbournepressclub.com/quills/2013/best-radio-current-affairs-report/neil-mitchell_radio-3aw-melbourne-pty-ltd
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:24, 20 January 2018 (UTC)