Talk:Neil Hanchard
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic Did you know nomination
This article was nominated for deletion on 1 April 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
A fact from Neil Hanchard appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 April 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:17, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that geneticist Neil Hanchard (pictured) was a senior author on a publication surveying human genomic diversity in Africa that was described by Nature as "a milestone in genomics research"? "An extensive study of genomic data from people in Africa has revealed more than three million previously undescribed genetic variants, many of them in populations whose DNA had never been sampled before. The study is a milestone in genomics research." https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03028-3 Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Created by Philepitta (talk) and KCStat (talk). Nominated by Philepitta (talk) at 03:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: - Still needed
Overall: Needs a QPQ. Other than that it's good to go. —Granger (talk · contribs) 20:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! I've now reviewed Norman C. Deno. Philepitta (talk) 23:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! Looks good. —Granger (talk · contribs) 06:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Philepitta The article has been tagged as non-notable. SL93 (talk) 21:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- I nominated this for AfD to move this along - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Hanchard. SL93 (talk) 23:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination on hold while this is at AfD. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- I nominated this for AfD to move this along - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Hanchard. SL93 (talk) 23:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! I've now reviewed Norman C. Deno. Philepitta (talk) 23:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)