This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I think there should certainly be a pop culture reference section in the pages about Jacob and his 12 sons. For example: "Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat", which is a popular live theater musical made famous on broadway and a film starring Donny Osmund, competely mixes up the order of the sons making Judah one of the youngest and stating the Rachel was Jacob's favorite wife when both are completely false. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.64.241.110 (talk) 01:22, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
It is INCREDIBLY ANNOYING to read the "some scholars bla bla bla postdiction aetology"-nonsense on EVERY SINGLE page relating to the 12 Tribes - cannot this disclaimer instead be posted on A SINGLE page for itself ?
It makes for repetitive and useless reading.
Each article must stand on it's own; not everyone is reading every article related to a topic, nor can you expect someone to read every article in order to find a "disclaimer" which should have been in each article. — al-Shimoni (talk) 20:40, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
It's not a "postdiction" (nothing claims to be a prediction). Much else in the wording is pretentious. 151.200.41.108 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC).Reply
