Talk:Nahikari García

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Jaguar in topic GA Review


GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nahikari García/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 11:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


I should have this done by Sunday JAGUAR  11:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    The lead needs expanding quite a bit to summarise the article's body
    " The programme wasn't solely football based" - was not
    "She ended the campaign with 10 goals to her name for the season" - can this have a citation?
    "García has worn the number 7 jersey for both club and country" - missing word?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

The lead definitely needs expanding before I can promote this. I also picked out a couple of minor issues but other than that the article is solid.   JAGUAR  18:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jaguar, thanks a lot for the review of this article, and for the others you assisted with. It is greatly appreciated. I have extended the lede a bit. Let me know if that is enough. Cheers, Liam E. Bekker (talk) 22:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for expanding the lead! There's nothing else outstanding, so I'll promote this now. It's generally well written and comprehensive for the subject.   JAGUAR  10:05, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply