Talk:Muslims/Archive 6

Edit request from Fadyyousif1, 2 September 2011

the picture must be changed it's not appropriate for the islam make it the word more attractive or wrote the word only. Fadyyousif1 (talk) 15:41, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Er, which picture exactly, and how is it unattractive? i kan reed (talk) 15:52, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed.. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 18:17, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Fadyyousif, this picture is inappropriate and unrepresentative of Muslims.--Correctus2kX (talk) 22:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

I have made the necessary edit, the previous image was overly linked to one particular group of Muslims, and did not encapsulate the faith as a whole.--Correctus2kX (talk) 22:19, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Edit request from Kauserali, 20 September 2011

The article is quite accurate except for its mention of the word "muslim" also being pronounced "moslem," as this second incarnation is derived from an insult; the modern hebrew word "golem" was the inspiration for this intentional, derogatory mispronunciation. Golem means "unshaped, dumb, helpless."

Thus, "moslem" is an intentional slur against the proper pronunciation "muslim."

Muslim is derived for the arabic root word S-L-M (like hebrew, arabic words have consonant-only roots) which is the source of the word "islam," (willing) submission to (the one) God. A "muslim" is one who (willingly) submits to (the one) God.

Thank you. Kauserali (talk) 23:18, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Actually, the moslem pronunciation comes from Persian, where that is how the Arabic is pronounced. It has nothing to do with Jews at all. Ogress _smash! 04:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

• @ Kauserali - Do you have any sources for your claims? We go by sources here.

Tamsier (talk) 15:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Demographics factual accuracy

The whole of this section uses one source [1] - a source that is not only strongly affiliated with the subject, but factually inaccurate and may be viewed as trying to overstate the number of Muslim people in the world. Take Senegal as an example. The source says that 96% of the population are Muslims, yet the Serer who make up the third largest ethnic group are and have been mostly Animist and still are mostly Animist or Christians [2]; [3].

"The Serer were known for their adherence to a traditional animist religion and, even today, only a few people among them have converted to either Islam or Christianity." (Willie F. Page. Encyclopedia of African history and culture: African kingdoms (500 to 1500), Volume 2, p 191. Publisher: Facts on File, 2001. ISBN: 0816044724. Also see Volume 1.)

Even if some Serers converted to Islam recently or Christianity, [4] by virtue of the fact that they are the third largest group in Senegal and are mostly animists, combined with the Jola population who are also mostly animists or Christians [5], the Senegal muslim percentage prescribed by the article's source could not add up to 96%. The same argument is evident in Nigeria especially among the Yoruba people and other groups. It is mainly the Hausas who are muslims. Tamsier (talk) 17:35, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

"Müslümanlık"

Among Turks, the term "Müslümanlık" is also used as a alternative word for İslam. Müslüman means "Muslim" and "lık" is similar to suffix "ism" in English. Therefore Müslüman (Muslim) -> Müslümanlık (Muslimism) like how Christian -> Christianity — Preceding unsigned comment added by AkrepCelal (talk • contribs) 14:59, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Daily prayer, 13 June 2012

Daily prayer is called Salah, not Salat. Also one of the five is forgotten. (Shahada)

Please fix it, thanks.

Fixed the shahada issue. Thanks. But there is a discussion about Salat and Salah at talk:Salah, and both seem to be acceptable. Wiqi⁽⁵⁵⁾ 11:31, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 1 July 2012

It says "Messenger of the God" in the third paragraph. It should be "Mesenger of God."

Thank you.

Son of Adam (talk) 06:49, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

 Done Thanks. Wiqi⁽⁵⁵⁾ 11:31, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 13 October 2012

At the start of the article it says 'Moslem' is also an alternative spelling for 'Muslim' which is false. It needs to be removed before people looking for real/true facts and information that don't know very much see it and think it's an actual alternative spelling. Fatima.F13 (talk) 08:59, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 09:15, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 19 November 2012

Bum1234567987656 (talk) 23:55, 19 November 2012 (UTC) we are the best religion ever

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Vacation^nine 00:14, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Request for comment

		Proposal for removing prefixes "Islamic views on xyz"
		I have started a request move to remove the prefixes Attached with the Prophets in Islam to there Names as in Islam. Like Islamic views on Abraham → Ibrahim as it becomes difficult to search the topic. Please participate in the discussion at Talk:Page Thanks. --Ibrahim ebi (talk) 19:24, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 2 January 2013

the spelling "moslem" is wrong "muslim" is right 86.99.221.229 (talk) 15:56, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. The article explains that "Moslem" is an older transliteration. If you think this is insufficient, feel free to reopen this request and propose a specific change. However, Wikipedia articles generally aren't prescriptive in matters of spelling. Rivertorch (talk) 19:30, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Moslem vrs Muslim

The word Moslem is incorrect because this is an arabic word not english. Moslem has a different meaning than Muslim. Just as in english if you change the pronunciation just a tad it can mean some thing totally different such as Car and Care. Sounds different and different meaning.

Here is an article for your consideration that discusses it and why it is so offensive to Muslims.

http://hnn.us/articles/524.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.198.215.7 (talk) 15:24, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Amazing. I was just about to post the same thing. Well, if no one has responded ...— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 15:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

I didn't respond because it looked like an "fyi" sort of post. What exactly is being proposed here for the article? I'm aware that Muslim is the preferred modern spelling—and, indeed, it's used throughout this article and most other relevant articles—but we can't simply say that Moslem is "incorrect". If reliable sources discuss the matter, then the article can discuss it, too (being careful of undue weight, of course). Rivertorch (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

It looks important, but I'm guessing for something this controversial we'd need a really reliable source. My proposed change is to say in the article that the preferred spelling has changed because "reliable source" says Muslims are offended by the "Moslem" spelling because of "this definition" or "this reason". My plan, when I have more time, is to research why newspapers actually stopped spelling 'Muslim" as "Moslem". At one library I plan to go to later in the week, I have free access to certain newspapers' archives which might be able to answer the question.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Sounds good. You might also check the major style manuals if you get the chance. Rivertorch (talk) 22:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

I wouldn't know how to do that. I guarantee you the people who work here wouldn't know how. And I'm not having any real luck. "Moslem" is used less, but still used.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:24, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 6 August 2013

The definition of the word Muslim is a person who submits to the will of God 108.94.188.203 (talk) 17:17, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Note that it does already say almost exactly that in the first paragraph. Rivertorch (talk) 09:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 17 August 2013

The first sentence of this page has had the word cult added twice as well as a mention of hate speech. Nadrii (talk) 15:51, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Unfortunately, vandalism does occur even on semi-protected articles, but it is usually undone quickly. The most recent act of vandalism was reverted in less than a minute by one of my all-time favorite Wikipedians. If you see vandalism lingering in the article, by all means report it here. Rivertorch (talk) 18:21, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Reverting edit by Paul August

I'm reverting an edit by user Paul August. I have given a grammatical proof on his talk page for editors to view why his edit was incorrect. Here is the link:

User_talk:Paul_August

Feel free to join in with comments on my Talk Page since its a bad show to populate another editor's page with comments.

Sluffs (talk) 10:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Another editor called Wiqi55 has cleared that up. I was wrong - I thought it was about creation emanating from God but its not. I thought beget was to cause or occur but in this context its to father, sire - it can only be one or the other. An Islamic site says: The third ayat describes that Allah does not give birth nor is He given birth.

My mistake - if the Islamic scholars want to couple "not nor" then that's fine by me.

"He begetteth not nor is He begotten"

Sluffs (talk) 15:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

This is the Tafsir al-Jalalayn version:

He neither begot, for no likeness of Him can exist, nor was begotten, since createdness is precluded in His case.

The version in the article as suggested by Wiqi55 is from Sahih International which is a transliteration for English readers.

Here's the link to the Wikipedia article on Tafsir_al-Jalalayn:

Tafsir al-Jalalayn

The Tafsir al-Jalalayn has been around since 1459 so how about we take a cue from its interpretation. It would be nice to get it spot on.

Sluffs (talk) 18:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

What a waffle. Yep. Its "neither begets nor was begotten" - which states that no organic or inorganic object can be born or originate from him (Jesus, you, your cat, the images of him at the Sistine Chapel) because he is perfect and transcends representation or divisibility (the trinity is described as three parts of the same being) and that nothing was the cause of him (absolute, alone, one, unique). I'll go and change it now. Sorry about wasting your time while I worked out the "not nor" issue which actually was probably just a missing comma in the correct transliteration.

Sluffs (talk) 00:40, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 December 2013

Please start with: A Muslim is someone who believes Islam.

Amir dadair (talk) 02:02, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

The first line in the article is "A Muslim, sometimes spelled Moslem, is an adherent of Islam." I think we're covered there. --ElHef (Meep?) 02:42, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

First use of the word 'Muslim"

When was the word Muslim first used and who was the first muslim? Ctbolt (talk) 08:33, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Muslim is derived from an Arabic word, meaning "the one who submits" or "the one who believes" or even "the one who accepts". Versions of it are used in the Quran; Our Lord, and make us Muslims [in submission] to You and from our descendants a Muslim nation [in submission] to You. And show us our rites and accept our repentance. Indeed, You are the Accepting of repentance, the Merciful. [2:128] The exact wording in this verse (romanized) is Muslimayni, and then Muslimathun. The variations come from verb tenses or something of that nature. As for who was the first Muslim, the Muslims themselves argue that Adam and Eve were the first Muslims; anyone who submits to the "true belief" is a Muslim by definition. If you want to get technical, then the first Muslim when Islam became an official religion by that name would be the Prophet Muhammad PBUH, then his wife Khadijah AS, then his best friend Abu Bakr AS. Hope this helps :) Hope Bloom (talk) 05:20, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

See also [6]. [7], [8] [9], [10], [11], [12], and elsewhere. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 07:32, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Edit Request

The page is very concise and detailed, although I was wondering why there are no 'notable individuals' in the page? Some examples of notable Muslim individuals could include Muhammad Ali, Malcolm X, and Al-Khwarizmi (father of modern Algebra). Thanks!Hope Bloom (talk) 22:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Hmmm... the Christians article has a Christians#Notable individuals section which provides a summary style soft redirect to the Lists of Christians article. A Lists of Muslims article exists, as does Lists of Jews, Lists of atheists and some others; see Lists of people by belief#Lists of people by religious belief. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes, there are lists... But why not have a few brief examples of some famous Muslims in the article itself?? The Christian article has Notable individuals Main article: Lists of Christians as one of its headings... Why not add the same sort of thing to this Muslim article? Hope Bloom (talk) 00:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Nobody has argued otherwise here. I might suggest that you be bold and do it, but I see that the article is semi-protected and your edit count is still in single digits. Do you have some particular edit you would propose to have made to this article? You seem to be suggesting something along the lines of the Christians#Notable individuals section, and perhaps mentioning a few notable individual Muslims there as well -- probably Muhammad, perhaps early organizers such as Abu Bakr, `Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib, and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (or perhaps not). Please provide a detailed and specific description of what changes you propose. See Wikipedia:Edit requests. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 04:13, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

I think you've got the basic idea. I was thinking of some more modern examples, like Muhammad Ali, because some contemporary viewers may not know who Abu Bakr or Ali ibn Abu Talib is. A brief summary of some of the most renown Islamic individuals, and their contributions to the modern world underneath the heading Notable Individuals would be sufficient.... Something like (paraphrasing from the Christian article here); "...Muslims have made numerous contributions in the realm of medicine, science, mathematics, sports, arts, banking, and other modern fields. One notable individual is Mathematician Al-Khwarizmi, who is known to be a Father of Modern Algebra. A modern Muslim figure well known today is boxer Muhammad Ali, who's considered among the greatest heavyweights in the history of boxing." It doesn't have to be worded exactly like this, but this gives the basic idea of what I am going for. Hope Bloom (talk) 05:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

(Not directly related to the article) Calling Al-Khwarizmi Father of Modern Algebra is hilarious. In mathematics, modern algebra has a definitive meaning, which is abstract algebra. Big names include Galois, Abel, Jordan, Noether, Artin etc. Al-Khwarizmi has literally zero role in this part. The concept (axioms) of a group did not appear until the 19th century, long after Al-Khwarizmi's age. 128.189.191.60 (talk) 13:36, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

to ^^^ try reading1 and 2. Khawarizmi was the first to use the word Algebra for mathematics; that word is derived from arabic itself. The word algebra is a Latin variant of the Arabic word al-jabr . This came from the title of a book, Hidab al-jabr wal-muqubala , written in Baghdad about 825 A.D. by the Arab mathematician Mohammed ibn-Musa al-Khwarizmi. I don't think this is modern algebra per say, but it is more of the roots of modern Algebra. If you want, just change the wording in the small example blurb I put up from modern Algebra to just Algebra. Hope Bloom (talk) 01:12, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Honesty

I am concerned about the honesty of the article, of editors concerned and of a potential influence to manipulate content towards radicalisation.

Dictionaries typically give definitions of Muslim as: a follower of the religion of Islam - Google: Muslim definition. However the article had described Muslim as an adherent of Islam, skipping the Major English dictionaries. Instead the editor went to TheFreeDictionary.com which gave the definition: 1. also Mos·lem (mzlm, ms-) A believer in or adherent of Islam. The editor did not represent the definition as was but dishonestly picked out the non-baseline content.

please see:
Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion

It is meant to be encyclopaedic with honest content.

Based on the experience mentioned I am concerned about the contents of the second paragraph. Can anyone cite that a person would universally be considered NOT to be a Muslim if that person failed at any one of the points mentioned: belief in God and specifically as eternal, transcendent and absolutely one, holding to the view that God is incomparable, self-sustaining and neither begets nor was begotten; and believe that Islam is the complete and universal version of a primordial faith that has been revealed before through many prophets including Abraham, Moses, Ishmael and Jesus; and believe that these previous messages and revelations have been partially changed or corrupted over time and that the Qur'an is the final unaltered revelation from God (The Final Testament).

An honest approach may be to leave it with the dictionary definition: that a Muslim is a person who believes in or follows the religion of Islam and then state what Islam teaches.

The article Islam by country gives the percentage of various populations that are considered to be Muslim. Do all these people listed match all the criteria given?

Gregkaye ✍♪ 17:42, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 April 2015

how about adding india as 3rd populist muslim nation, as also mentioned in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_India Suman.bahuguna (talk) 08:52, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. You cannot use Wikipedia to as a source, as Wikipedia doesn't cite itself. Kharkiv07^Talk 13:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Biased article

Just an example: "About 13% of Muslims live in Indonesia, the largest Muslim country," 13% of Muslims does NOT make Indonesia a "Muslim country". On the other side it states a claim from an extreme point of view, that islam has a right to conquer Indonesia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.9.138.132 (talk) 11:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

It means 13% of all Muslims live in Indonesia. 87.2% of Indonesia is Muslim. Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 13:33, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Hidden truth

Muslim does not mean "one who submits (to God)" but "one who submits" the part "(to God)" is a one interpretation and so it is simply not an objective translation. That leads to the conclusion that the article tries to hide the real meaning! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.9.138.132 (talk) 11:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

I do not see the Queran or Koran or whatever listed among your references for your definition of Muslim. That seems significant to me. There are many interpretations of good books. I'm wondering about you editing talk consciousness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.221.59.168 (talk) 00:50, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Muslim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120315100329/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5ht18N8tINGelAWExQSbvwxXXCsjg to http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5ht18N8tINGelAWExQSbvwxXXCsjg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:22, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Muslim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100809124154/http://www.britannica.com:80/EBchecked/topic/540503/Shiite to http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/540503/Shiite

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Very Important and Critical edit request!

In Demographic Heading there is a mistake in the body, the third largest sect in Muslim world is not considered as Ahmadis. Ahmadiyya is a separate religion and it has nothing to do with Islam. According to Islamic law all over the world from any branch of Islam, from any sect of Islam, from any scholar of Islam, and as per law of Pakistan, Ahmedis are considered as Non-Muslim. It is Because of the reason that they do not fulfill the condition of Kalma-e-Tayyaba and Kalma-e-shadat.

In which it is testify that, “There is no God except Allah and Muhammad (P.B.U.H) is the messenger of Allah.”

Following notification was issued by the National Assembly Secretariat of Paksitan: N.A Bill No.29 of 1974. "Amendment of Article 106 of the Constitution. -- In the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, hereinafter referred to as the Constitution, in article 106, in clause (3) after the word "communities", the words and brackets "and persons of the Qadiani group or the Lahori group (who called themselves 'Ahmadis') shall be inserted."

Amendment of Article 260 of the Constitution. -- In the Constitution, in Article 260, after clause (2), the following new clause shall be added, namely:--

(3) A person who does not believe in the absolute and unqualified finality of the Prophet hood of Muhammad (peace be upon Him), the last of the Prophets or claims to be a prophet, in any sense of the word or of any description whatsoever, after Muhammad (peace be upon Him), or recognises such a claimant as a prophet or a religious reformer, is not a Muslim for the purposes of the Constitution or Law. It is therefore highly requested and recommended that please remove ahmadiyya sect from the body of demographic heading. Thankyou. United11wood (talk) 05:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)(UW) 21st March, 2016

References

Speaking up against "radical-Muslim Jihad"

On FoxNews Channel, we saw (Oliver North, "War Stories") a special that included the story of the beginning of more than a dozen creating the "Muslim Reform Movement". This is an amazing development and is an idea whose time has come, as ISIS/ISIL goes to many nations. Take a look at their website.

http://MuslimReformMovement.org/

AstroU (talk) 05:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

---

Semi-protected edit request on 15 April 2016

Please change the Muslim to Middle Eastern and stop following the Mainstream Media it's really insulting us period i am an Norwegian/Middle Eastern-American <3 83.243.167.174 (talk) 03:57, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Cannolis (talk) 04:34, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

"Moslem"

According to a few sources, notably the History News Network and the Washington post, Moslem can be pronounced in such a way that it means "oppressor" or "one who is unjust." I'm not sure if this warrants its own article, but maybe it should at least be mentioned when noted as an alternate spelling. Thoughts? Prmcd16 (talk) 11:42, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.212.21.195 (talk) 15:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC) 

witnessing the oneness of Allah

Declaring "shahadah" is : there is no God but Allah and that Mohammad is His servant (worshiper) and messenger. There is no "last messenger". 2601:586:8101:CC7D:BD4A:4190:14FF:724E (talk) 17:53, 20 September 2016 (UTC)AHMED ELSABBAGH Thank you.

Please update the shahadah with the correct phase (i.e. "There is no god but God, Muhammad is the messenger of God") from the source page or, preferably, a Qur'an source online (e.g. https://quran.com/3:18) Buteo lineatus (talk) 18:05, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 05:55, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 November 2016

Allah Akbar! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImWrong56 (talk • contribs) 18:11, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Edit Request

In 2nd Paragraph of Demographic, India's Muslim population is not shown which accounts 10.9% of world's muslim population rather it is shown under minority Muslim population country. Ujjwal1109 (talk) 08:26, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 November 2016

The Name of Prophet Muhammad should be written in full with (P.B.U.H) , Like Jesus Christ. Another things is that write Holy Books in the belief box. its the fifth one as there are total five not four.

Hope you will understand this and will change it. Asesino.amando12 (talk) 08:22, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

 Not done and won't be done - our guideline at WP:PBUH is that The Prophet, SAWW, SWT and PBUH should be removed, not added - Arjayay (talk) 10:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 November 2016

A Muslim (Arabic: مسلم) is a person who testifies that there is no god other than Allah the only God our creator, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and considers the Koran as A verbatim said by Allah, revealed through the prophet Mohammed by Gabriel (angel). It also follows the sunna (the way) to know the exact way of worshiping Allah, in the Sunni teachings and practices of Muhammad as inscribed in the traditional accounts called hadith. This goes through the practices of one of the forms of Islam, Abrahamic and monotheistic religion. The word "Muslim" comes from Arabic, "he who is at peace and submits" to the will of God Onetrustyone (talk) 22:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Not done: as you have not requested a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
More importantly, you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 22:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Man/woman/teenager/adolescent

There are customs holding that a man and woman or teenager and adolescent above the age of fifteen of a lunar or solar calendar

This bit in the opening seems jumbled, especially with the mix of "and" and "or". Could it not just say "person"?

Education

@Jobas: Yes, demographic analysis can cover groups defined by educational levels. That doesn't mean that it studies educational levels. Take a look at demographics sections in some country articles. You've added the information about Muslim education statistics into Muslim world, and that was a constructive addition. I'm not going to follow you around, but it seems that you want to put it into as many articles as you can. Please pay closer attention to relevance and due weight. Thanks. Eperoton (talk) 03:03, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 February 2017

Muslin has a hatnote, {{distinguish|Muslim}}. Please reciprocate by adding {{distinguish|Muslin}} to this article. 208.95.51.115 (talk) 15:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC) 208.95.51.115 (talk) 15:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Done JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 May 2017

Please change (''[[sunnah]] '') to (''[[sunnah]]'') - thanks. 82.132.232.168 (talk) 23:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Done Gulumeemee (talk) 03:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)