Talk:Musa balbisiana

Photo

Any actual evidence that the photo is actually of Musa balbisiana? I'm pretty sure it's a photo that's been making the rounds as a "wild banana" and not specifically this species. Positively identified photos of M. balbisiana fruits show a fairly different fruit morphology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mortrek (talk • contribs) 19:43, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Nothing direct really. But there's a photo by Ploetz of M. balbisiana here, and you can identify this by comparison. The angularity and thickness of the fruit in the photo also makes it likely to be M. balbisiana (as opposed to M. acuminata).

But how come? Can you give a link to a diagnosis or a reliably ID'd picture of M. balbisiana that makes this unlikely to be one? Of course, if you happen to have unambiguously identified photos of M. balbisiana, donating one to Wikipedia would be much appreciated. -- Obsidi♠n Soul 01:26, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

References

Both the banana crops website and the link to the particular product on http://www.banana-tree.com are not working. I never saw the original pages. I am just trying to draw attention to this. Triscal (talk) 02:35, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Musa balbisiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081013114733/http://www.banana-tree.com/Product_Detail~category~13~Product_ID~18995.cfm to http://www.banana-tree.com/Product_Detail~category~13~Product_ID~18995.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Musa balbisiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707210203/http://www.bananacrop.com/2010/01/progenitors-of-edible-bananas-in.html to http://www.bananacrop.com/2010/01/progenitors-of-edible-bananas-in.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140413143722/http://archive.lib.cmu.ac.th/full/T/2005/biol0805uu_ch4.pdf to http://archive.lib.cmu.ac.th/full/T/2005/biol0805uu_ch4.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)