Talk:Mount Aino

Requested move

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

It's been over three weeks and there has been insufficient input to garner a consensus. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:59, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

---

Mount Aino → Mount Ai — I think we should remove the redundant no that is a mere preposition (almost equivalent to English "of") and has no particular meaning here; same case as Mount Tō, whose original name is Tōnodake. Yasu (talk) 14:55, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Oppose to Mount Aino and Mount Ai: Mount Tō is strange naming. Mt. Tonotake is acceptable. Mount Aino (I could find a few sample in google books) and Mount Ai are also strange naming. Mount Ainodake, Mt. Ainodake (Ainodake) or Mount Ainotake, Mt. Ainotake (Ainotake) are acceptable like Yatsugatake Mountains. Takabeg (talk) 10:33, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

• "Mount Aino" -Llc 9, I think most of them are irrelevant from this mountain.
• Mount + "Aino-dake" -Llc 13
• Mount + Ainotake -Llc 9
• Mount + Ainodake -Llc 25

-- Takabeg (talk) 10:23, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Comment For me, "Mount Ainodake" or "Mt. Ainodake" is strange naming; "Mount X-dake" is a redundant term since dake means "mountain" in Japanese, so such a naming should be avoided. Just "Ainodake" (as we Japanese call it) is acceptable, but I believe "Mount Ai" is much better according to the current naming convention for mountains of Japan. BTW, the original name of the mountain in kana is あいのだけ and not あいのたけ, so "Ainotake" is incorrect transliteration. Yasu (talk) 16:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

• I think Mount Ainodake is best choice per google books & 2008 Yamanashi Facts and Figures, Public Relations Division, Yamanashi Prefectural Government, p. 4. Takabeg (talk) 04:34, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

I agree that the name should be changed, but I am not sure yet to what. Will ask at WPJ for the current policy (if there is any). As far as I understand X-yama, X-no-dake,... become "Mount X" unless "X" is very short (one letter or so). bamse (talk) 11:09, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Aino. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090609164634/http://sokuservice1.gsi.go.jp/datums/ to http://sokuservice1.gsi.go.jp/datums/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722105156/http://watchizux.gsi.go.jp/watchizu.aspx?b=353846&l=1381342 to http://watchizux.gsi.go.jp/watchizu.aspx?b=353846&l=1381342

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)