Talk:Moscow City Hall (Idaho)

Newsletter of the Moscow Historic Preservation Commission

• This document contains substantial additional information about the courthouse/city hall and their historical significance. Preservation Moscow: Newsletter of the Moscow Historic Preservation Commission :: May 2010. bd2412 T 04:01, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Page moved to Moscow City Hall (Idaho). This basic form seems to have a clear consensus. There does not appear to be a consensus to repeat Moscow. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:20, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Moscow, Idaho, City Hall → Moscow City Hall (Moscow, Idaho)—Move to a standard type name. A source has been provided which documents "Moscow City Hall" as name. No source supports "Moscow, Idaho, City Hall". Adding some disambiguating phrase is necessary, and I believe adding (City, State) type disambiguation phrase is best, in parallel to names of most NRHP-listed and other places. And to convey there is a Moscow, Idaho; this is not a copy of the city hall in Russia like the London Bridge in arizona. But the main thing is: use a name supported by sources. --doncram (talk) 12:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

• What about Moscow (Idaho) City Hall? Powers ^T 14:03, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

That would be out of the usual format for historic buildings and other places, and I think probably against naming conventions guidelines. Hmm, looking at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#Disambiguation i don't see that specifically addressed, but i am not aware of any examples like what you suggest. I think the reasonable candidates using "Moscow City Hall" would be "Moscow City Hall (Idaho)" or "Moscow City Hall (Moscow, Idaho)", and i prefer the latter. Like i said, in part i prefer the latter to convey this is not a copy, in Idaho, of the Moscow City Hall in Moscow, like the London Bridge in arizona is a copy of a London Bridge in London. Also, I just like following the (City, State) practice consistently in articles about U.S. historic buildings and otherwise. By the way, I do notice that there is hatnote disambiguation at Moscow City Hall already pointing to this article, which would be updated following a rename. --doncram (talk) 20:50, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

I think I'd prefer MCH(I) here, as you suggest, rather than duplicating "Moscow". I created an article at Brewer High School (Brewer, Maine), but it was moved to just have the Maine disambiguator, which makes sense to me here as well. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:26, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

The London Bridge (Lake Havasu City) is most definitely NOT a replica of the London Bridge in London. Anyway, it's not the place of the title to try to eliminate every possible misconception about the subject; it's sufficient that the title uniquely identify the subject. Moscow City Hall (Idaho) does that just fine without being redundant. Powers ^T 10:54, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

• Comment what about City Hall (Moscow, Idaho) ? 76.66.203.138 (talk) 05:37, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

I considered that, but http://www.moscow.id.us/cityclerk/city_clerk.aspx lists it as "Moscow City Hall", as does BD2412's link above, so that's what I went with. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:57, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

• Support move as nominated, though I think even better would be Moscow City Hall (Idaho) as suggested by Doncram and also preferred by SarekOfVulcan and Powers; there is no reason to repeat Moscow in the disambiguation information; this title would clearly convey the correct name of the subject, Moscow City Hall, while also effectively disambiguating. I don't think this title suggests the one in Idaho is a copy of the one in Russia. --Born2cycle (talk) 21:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moscow City Hall (Idaho). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718091010/http://www.moscow.id.us/commissions/historic/PreservationMoscow2010-11.pdf to http://www.moscow.id.us/commissions/historic/PreservationMoscow2010-11.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:48, 6 February 2018 (UTC)