Talk:Mohammed Fenaitel Mohamed Al Daihani

disputed picture

Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{npov}} tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption. Geo Swan 05:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

revert -- see talk

I reverted a recent edit as per this discussion. Geo Swan (talk) 06:12, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

move

What is the source for the name that is used now? After i carefully evaluated the sources in the article and multiple secondary sources from search results. I plan to move the article to Mohammad Finaytal al Dehani. Any objection? IQinn (talk) 13:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Iqinn, um, did your careful evaluation skip the article's identity sections? You asked the source of the current name?

From the identity section:

• He was identified as Mohammed Fenaital Mohamed Al Daihani on the Summary of Evidence memo prepared for his Combatant Status Review Tribunal, on 22 September 2004, on the Summary of Evidence memo prepared for his Administrative Review Board, on 22 April 2005, and on seven official lists of captives' names.
  • OARDEC (April 20, 2006). "List of detainee who went through complete CSRT process" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. Retrieved 2007-09-29.
  • OARDEC (22 September 2004). "Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal -- Al Daihani, Mohammed Fenaital Mohamed" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. pp. pages 52-53. Retrieved 2008-03-12.
  • OARDEC (22 April 2005). "Unclassified Summary of Evidence for Administrative Review Board in the case of Al Daihani, Mohammed Fenaitel Mohamed" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. pp. pages 24-25. Retrieved 2008-03-12.
  • OARDEC (July 17, 2007). "Index for Combatant Status Review Board unclassified summaries of evidence" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. Retrieved 2007-09-29.
  • OARDEC (September 4, 2007). "Index for testimony" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. Retrieved 2007-09-29.
  • OARDEC (August 8, 2007). "Index for CSRT Records Publicly Files in Guantanamo Detainee Cases" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. Retrieved 2007-09-29.
  • OARDEC (August 9, 2007). "Index to Summaries of Detention-Release Factors for ARB Round One" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. Retrieved 2007-09-29.
  • OARDEC (August 9, 2007). "Index of Transcripts and Certain Documents from ARB Round One" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. Retrieved 2007-09-29.
  • OARDEC (July 17, 2007). "Index to Transfer and Release Decision for Guantanamo Detainees" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. Retrieved 2007-09-29.
  • James R. Crisfield Jr (October 12, 2004). "Declaration of Legal Advisor" (PDF). Office for the Administrative Review of Detained Enemy Combatants. pp. page 1. Retrieved 2007-06-27

Iqinn, I haven't forgotten that you have called the OARDEC WP:RS "questionable" and "unreliable" and "primary sources". The Summary of Evidence memo are textbook examples of secondary sources. This is a point it seems to me that you have simply declined to respond to. And it seems to me that your characterization of them as "questionable" and "unreliable" has never been meaningfull explained.. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); line feed character in |accessdate= at position 11 (help)

As to whether there are any objections. Yes, I am concerned over this suggestion. The way I see it, as the person proposing the move I think it is your responsibility to offer reasons why the article should be moved. I suggest to you, if you don't think it is important enough for you to show your work, and offer reasons for the move, then you should regard this as a sign that this move is not important enough to be performed. Geo Swan (talk) 01:08, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mohammed Fenaitel Mohamed Al Daihani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080313135752/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/ARB_Round_1_Factors_001161-001234.pdf to http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/ARB_Round_1_Factors_001161-001234.pdf
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5pBcmRbxD?url=http://frum.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OTQxMWVkMjJlNWZiMmE3ZmRlYTM5MDU4ZWFlOTQxOGY= to http://frum.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OTQxMWVkMjJlNWZiMmE3ZmRlYTM5MDU4ZWFlOTQxOGY=
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kuwaittimes.net%2Fread_news.php%3Fnewsid%3DNDIzNDE4Njg4&date=2009-07-31 to http://www.kuwaittimes.net/read_news.php?newsid=NDIzNDE4Njg4

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)