Talk:Mice Love Rice

Lyrics are copyrighted; do not add them

Lyrics to the song are copyrighted. Please, therefore, do not add the lyrics to Wikipedia as per WP:C, which is policy. Two previous attempts at adding the lyrics have been reverted.[1][2] —Goh wz 10:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Partial/meaningful lyric citation is okay. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:02, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Dubious links

The link mouse-loves-rice.com appears to be for English classes, not the song. Also one of the links to the blogs requires a log in on the other end. I am removing both links. Cyberiagirl (talk) 22:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Number 57 12:54, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

---

Mice Love Rice → Lao Shu Ai Da Mi – Not an English song, doesn't have any official English title. Timmyshin (talk) 08:45, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose. There's nothing wrong with a translated title: "If there is no established English-language treatment for a name, translate it if this can be done without loss of accuracy and with greater understanding for the English-speaking reader," per WP:UE. "Mouse Loves Rice" would be a better translation. (It's already used inside the article.) Amazon translates the title as "Mouse Loves Rice." Clodhopper Deluxe (talk) 23:27, 9 September 2014 (UTC) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kauffner

• Oppose - per Google Books results (Amazon is not a WP:RS). btw even it were not widely cited in English with the English name the proposed WP:PINYIN spacing is incorrect ...also that is a misunderstanding above about lyrics copyright, a song article is incomplete without some citation from the lyrics, usually the first line or some other significant lyrical content e.g. related to the song title. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:01, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose as this is improper pinyin orthography/spacing (see DeFrancis, ed. ABC Chinese-English Dictionary. Appendix 1 "Basic Rules for Hanyu Pinyin Orthography"), while this RM is based on a move to a transliterated (pinyin) title. --Cold Season (talk) 16:21, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

I don't have that book. Kindly educate me what the correct orthography should be? Timmyshin (talk) 23:10, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

It states: "Structures of two or three syllables which express an integral concept are to be written together as one word." It would properly be Laoshu Ai Dami. --Cold Season (talk) 03:23, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose. Sources use the current title. —  AjaxSmack  03:44, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mice Love Rice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711100150/http://www.glenclifford.com/WRIT/MOUSE/w4037709.html to http://www.glenclifford.com/WRIT/MOUSE/w4037709.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)