Talk:Melissa Hathaway

Proposed deletion

Recreated article after deletion for no content. I am in progress of adding content. I propose that the subject is notable, and that the content now added is worthwhile. I will continue to add content. Please let me know if you have any questions. Jcparsons (talk) 00:10, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm unclear as to why CSD A7 would apply. Ms. Hathaway is expected to be named to a significant position in the Obama administration, and is rumored to be in the running for Cybersecurity Czar. There isn't much information about her available online; I propose that this page contributes to the development of a holistic biography of Ms. Hathaway. Comments? Jcparsons (talk) 00:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

I'd also like to contest any deletion effort - Hathaway has plenty of sources and meets the general notability guideline. --Explodicle (T/C) 00:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Claiming that this page's subject is not notable or significant is absurd. There are far more obscure persons listed on Wikipedia than the soon-to-be Chief of Cybersecurity. A public figure who is already a senior intelligence official and will soon be "cyber czar" of the United States is certainly notable enough to have a Wikipedia article on her. --71.105.217.189 (talk) 00:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Oppose: I point to WP:COMMON. Seriously. Cite as many [a-zA-Z][0-9] criterion for deletion, one must simply state one to block it (refer to Wikipedia:NOT#BUREAUCRACY). We can use WP:NOTE, because like it or not, when the President of the United States Barack Obama mentions you as a potential candidate for such a high office, you are now notable. Or we can simply use WP:IAR to block the deletion and let the admins sort it out. (j/k) Int21h (talk) 01:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.cbronline.com/news/obama_to_name_cybersecurity_chief_090209

  Triggered by \bcbronline\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 19:44, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 00:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 15:48, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:20, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Melissa Hathaway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160307170534/http://execbizevents.com/executivebiz/events/event.php?event_id=141 to https://www.execbizevents.com/ExecutiveBiz/events/event.php?event_id=141

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)