A fact from Megan Coyne appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 September 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments4 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Comment: I'm not able to find any free photographs of Coyne, so I unfortunately cannot include an image in this nomination. I suspect that Theleekycauldron may have some ideas for hooks, so I'd like to hear what they have to say before this gets added to a prep.
Soooo... I did already make my own DYK nom earlier this morning, over at Template:Did you know nominations/New Jersey on Twitter (the article was since renamed). What we'll do is treat this as the nomination for Megan Coyne, and should the two be promoted as a double hook, we'll close both at once. If not, I have separate hooks that are up and ready to go, and I suggest that Red-tailed hawk prepare some as well :) with that said, here are my double hooks (labelled "d" for convenience): theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 04:55, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
ALT1: ... that Megan Coyne might have caused the White House to go "goblin mode" in a Twitter thread?
@Red-tailed hawk and Theleekycauldron: I think a double hook nomination works super well here and both articles are GTG as far as I can tell. Each user has provided a QPQ for their separate articles, Earwig looks good, and each article is new and long enough. Sourcing looks good too. I personally like ALT0, ALTd1, and ALTd3 the best but any hook with both links is good with me. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 16:57, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I saw this edit, which removed longstanding material from the article that was well-sourced, so I restored it. It was removed again, this time without explanation, so it was restored again. I'm opening this discussion here so that we can better talk about this than using (or not using) edit summaries, as the sources seem to actually support the claims made. — Red-tailed hawk(nest) 01:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply