This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I don't know how to contest or clear this log, but my suspicion is that the bot saw similarity with https://dof.princeton.edu/people/martha-himmelfarb-0 . It's true that some of the bio is based on that, but I did paraphrase it - just can only go so far with simple factual information like "XYZ went to ABC College in YEAR". The other possibility is that the "List of works" section is what triggered it, and if so, that's definitely wrong: identical-looking citations as other literature is fine. SnowFire (talk) 18:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
