This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This phrase confuses me "attached to the Empress Josephine as dame du palais in 1802." The choice of words "attached" is ambiguous at best, and I have no idea what a dame du palais is. (Lady of the palace, I infer--but still, what is that?) In my opinion that expression should either be explained or at least linked to the appropriate page; and perhaps the word 'attached' is not ideal. I'm not making any changes; maybe I'm just ignorant, but I think most readers would be confused by that sentence.Daniel Freeman (talk) 20:02, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
