Talk:METCO

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Stokescolin in topic Extensive Revision

Extensive Revision edit

I declare a conflict--I am the Director of Communications at METCO, Inc. In my role I have spent a few months researching the history of the program as well as clearing up misconceptions for the public. I've decided to be bold and contribute to this page. I'm grateful to you for reviewing and correcting my errors in content as well as form. My goal is primarily to provide clearer and more detailed summaries of METCO's structure and history. I have also added a list of notable alumni, though I'm not sure how to source that.

I definitely want to draw your attention to the things I deleted in the Challenges & Controversies section, not because I disagree with them but because I don't think they accurately represent the actual controversies. Assertions about lack of accountability, ageism, and district eligibility were supported by single articles or letters to the editor, some of which contained relevant data but did not support a claim of controversy (that is, a meaningful minority of people are making a given claim). I realize that an employee deleting controversy claims puts up red flags! There is plenty of controversy around METCO and I want it to be accurately presented. Probably a job for another editor.

I appreciate the opportunity to make these suggestions and I look forward to bringing attention to this unsung history. Stokescolin (talk) 17:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply


Untitled edit

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the [[Category:Massachusetts stub]] on the article page.

  • If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.

NPOV Discussion edit

Gene93k, you flagged recent edits as violating NPOV. Can you please specify what part of these edits rather than a wholesale revision? The edits appeared factual and well sourced, and constitute a much needed upgrade of a stub article. I have thus reversed the edit. (Gsmith10 (talk) 17:28, 13 October 2011 (UTC))Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on METCO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply