Talk:École nationale supérieure Louis-Lumière

(Redirected from Talk:Louis Lumière College)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Ivanvector in topic Requested move 23 August 2017

Changed "theorical" to "theoretical"

edit

Some dictionaries do still have "theorical" as a word, but its obsolete, and by many accounts not even a word. And the few definitions I CAN find show it to be an exact synonym of theoretical, so in this case I'm confident "theoretical" is preferable in every possible way to "theorical". Heck, it was probably just a typo to begin with; I doubt the person who wrote it even knew that "theorical" is 'sort of' a word. -Indalcecio (talk) 01:15, 20 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 23 August 2017

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: WITHDRAWN. See discussion for details. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:47, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply



Louis Lumière CollegeLouis-Lumière National Higher School – Current title is incorrect. Proposed title is the name of this institution in English; English article titles are preferred per WP:TITLE. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:42, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hm, that seems to be accurate. When first created from what looks like PR copy, it was called "ENS Louis Lumiere", which was changed shortly to "Louis Lumière College". The translation of École Nationale Supérieure to National Higher School came from an IP offering a "better translation of the school's name" but without providing any sources, or any rationale why such a translation was necessary in the first place. The school refers to itself in its own English materials by its French name, and as other schools in the ENS system seem to follow this convention and there isn't any prominent competing usage in other English sources, I don't see any reason to ignore that convention here. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:45, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.