Talk:Lone gunner of Flesquières
Latest comment: 1 year ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
A fact from Lone gunner of Flesquières appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 January 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 16:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that contemporary British accounts of the 1917 Battle of Cambrai attributed the loss of up to 16 tanks (examples pictured) on the first day to a lone German artillery officer? Source: "the figure of sixteen tanks destroyed by the lone officer came from the pen of none other than Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, in his history of the battle published shortly after the war" from Taylor, John (11 November 2016). Deborah and the War of the Tanks. Pen and Sword. p. 226. ISBN 978-1-4738-4834-4.
- ALT1: ... that the story of a lone German artillery officer disabling up to 16 British tanks (examples pictured) on the first day of the 1917 Battle of Cambrai was encouraged by the German Nazi Party? Source: "The Nazis transformed the hero into a noncommissioned officer, and gave him a name and at least one statue" from:Showalter, Dennis (1 December 2009). Hitler's Panzers: The Lightning Attacks that Revolutionized Warfare. Penguin. p. 15. ISBN 978-1-101-15168-6.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Zhang Congzheng
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 13:41, 22 December 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: @Dumelow: Good article. Article is sourced, hooks are interesting and the QPQ is done. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:25, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- Forgot to mention but you used the wrong battle of cambrai link. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:33, 22 December 2022 (UTC)