Talk:List of people in Playboy 1953–1959
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • List of Playboy Playmates of the Month Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:List of Playboy Playmates of the Month |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 30 August 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Missing Month
editWas there an issue for March, 1955? It's the only month in the entire stretch that has no information at all. CFLeon 00:43, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- No, there wasn't an issue that month; the magazine was behind schedule so they skipped a month. See the FAQ at Playboy.com. --Metropolitan90 08:53, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of people in Playboy 1953–59. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060326233118/http://www.playboy.com/worldofplayboy/faq/collecting.html to http://www.playboy.com/worldofplayboy/faq/collecting.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 17 July 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Withdrawn. I am going to go ahead and uncontroversially move these per the suggestions below. The editor whose username is Z0 16:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- List of people in Playboy 1953–59 → List of people in Playboy 1953–1959
- List of people in Playboy 1960–69 → List of people in Playboy 1960–1969
- List of people in Playboy 1970–79 → List of people in Playboy 1970–1979
- List of people in Playboy 1980–89 → List of people in Playboy 1980–1989
- List of people in Playboy 1990–99 → List of people in Playboy 1990–1999
- List of people in Playboy 2000–09 → List of people in Playboy 2000–2009
- List of people in Playboy 2010–19 → List of people in Playboy 2010–2019
– Per MOS:DOB. The editor whose username is Z0 11:49, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support, but these could just be moved due to the Wikipedia style of using the whole year if not consecutive. Lots of these around, like the lists of paintings by Picasso, and the only problem is to make sure the redirects work as these type of lists would probably have many links. Thanks for taking this project on. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:06, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- STRONGLY support per nom - and I agree with Randy Kryn that these should just be uncontroversially speedy moved per WP:DATERANGE. Paintspot Infez (talk) 16:21, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Unexplained symbol
editThe symbol † appearing next to some names is undefined. What does it signify. (If it's meant to signify a deceased person, I strongly recommend not using it as it's irrelevant to these listings unless it was a posthumous appearance (which Marilyn Monroe's certainly was not, at least not on the original No. 1). 70.73.90.119 (talk) 19:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- I've removed those symbols. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
How many total girls have posed for playboy?
editHow many total girls have posed for playboy? 2600:1700:F4D0:A80:38D1:E444:63F3:C581 (talk) 21:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- If I'm right, there has been around 790 Playmates before 2021. And then there are numerous other girls who have posed, of which I have no idea, how much have there been. 86.115.81.140 (talk) 19:33, 30 December 2021 (UTC)