Talk:List of members of the Privy Council for Canada (1911–1948)
Latest comment: 10 years ago by DrKiernan in topic Requested move
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved to "List of members of the Privy Council for Canada (1911–48)". DrKiernan (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
List of members of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada (1911–48) → List of members of the King's Privy Council for Canada (1911–48) – There was no Queen of Canada between 1911 and 1948. 98.217.224.217 (talk) 02:02, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Certainly correct that it should be King and not Queen. I personally prefer List of members of the Privy Council for Canada (1911–48).--Labattblueboy (talk)
- Support per nom. Obviously. The article is currently called Queen's Privy Council for Canada, so for consistency that's what we should use in the list (with the change of gender, obviously). But I agree that Privy Council for Canada would actually be a better title for the article, as that's its common name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:49, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Comment - what is the significance of the date ranges used for this set of articles? Did anything significant occur in 1948 to warrant that being the break in articles? The subsequent article List of members of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada (1948–1968) will definitely suffer from a problem because the first four years of that period were under a King, while the next 16 were under the Queen. — Amakuru (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- I think it's done by ministry rather than monarch. (I have no opinion on which way it should be done, just explaining how it is done currently.) DrKiernan (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.