Talk:List of Vale of Rheidol Railway rolling stock

Locomotives 4-6

What happened to them? Did they ever exist/if not, whey were these numbers jumped? Graldensblud 08:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

They never existed. This was caused by the different numbering schemes of different owners (in different historical periods). During the days of the first three locomotives there was also a fourth engine that was regularly on site, hired-in from another operator, but there is no evidence that it was ever formally numbered '4', although that was effectively its position. Timothy Titus ^{Talk To TT} 21:14, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Locomotive No 7

Does anyone have a nice photo of No 7? If added, it would complete the set on this page, and would seem to be very appropriate. My photos of No 7 are all either copyright or not very good! Timothy Titus 10:14, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Done! --Herby from Vienna 21:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Perfect! Thanks. Timothy Titus 17:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

040T Vulcan-Werke

I have a brochure by the Froissy Dompierre Light Railway which says that their 040T Vulcan Werke (3852) of 1925 was at the Vale of Rheidol till 1978. Hektor 19:49, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Nobody seems to have an answer, so I'm posting this question on the FDLR talk page. --Timothy Titus ^{Talk To TT} 09:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Edits by 79.75.63.204

I have reverted a series of edits by anonymous editor 79.75.63.204. Whilst one or two were legitimate, the vast majority were not, and they were too mixed in with each other to spend time distinguishing. With respect to 79.75.63.204, his/her 'corrections' to grammar were all ungrammatical, and his/her understanding of punctuation is not a mainstream one. Also, with respect, we do not remove the serial comma from other editors' work on Wikipedia. Some people may (strangely!) have received an education which militates against the serial comma, but for others its inclusion is standard practice. Timothy Titus ^{Talk To TT} 21:11, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Change this page to a list

I'm considering changing this page into a list of stock similar to User:Willsmith3/sandbox. This would remove a lot of the technical information which could then be included into individual articles with the history of the particular locos or grouped by early locos / Swindon tanks etc. This format is used in the Talyllyn Railway article. Anyone in favour?  Willsmith3  _(Talk) 17:52, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Vale of Rheidol Railway rolling stock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20080920054927/http://www.ffestiniograilway.co.uk/locos/palmerston.htm to http://www.ffestiniograilway.co.uk/locos/palmerston.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)