This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Basketball Association, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NBA on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Basketball AssociationWikipedia:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationTemplate:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationNBA articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
A fact from List of Seattle SuperSonics seasons appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 April 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 29 days ago8 comments4 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxtontalk 19:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Article is long enough and was expanded in the last three days. Sourcing looks good, as does Earwig. Both hooks are interesting and cited inline in the article, I prefer ALT0. No picture nominated so that is N/A. Per WP:QPQ two reviews will be required to finish up this nom since you're pretty well clear over 20 DYKs. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:57, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@PCN02WPS: The double QPQ is a bit of a surprise, looks like I missed the discussion on this. Does it retroactively apply to all nominations made before March 8? SounderBruce 04:29, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@SounderBruce: I have no idea about any discussion; I saw a couple of users enforcing it on nominations before the eighth and checked WP:QPQ, which says that it's been active for about 24 hours. Hadn't ever heard of it before tonight either. If I'm wrong that would be awesome, I'd have a few extra QPQs to spare. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 05:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@SounderBruce and PCN02WPS: Double QPQs are required for nominations after 8 March, not before; said discussion made no mention of the mode applying retroactively, and I think quite rightly.--Launchballer 11:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Article is long enough and was expanded in the last three days. Sourcing looks good, as does Earwig. Both hooks are interesting and cited inline in the article, I prefer ALT0. No picture nominated so that is N/A. Per WP:QPQ two reviews will be required to finish up this nom since you're pretty well clear over 20 DYKs. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:57, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
