Wikipedia

Talk:List of McMaster University people

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Alumnus list one

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hey everyone, this is the updated list of McMaster people that I have compiled. Some are already on this page.

YCCHAN 18:47, 28 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Added to list, some corrections made. YCCHAN 23:16, 28 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Removal of people on the list

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago12 comments5 people in discussion

User:GreenJoe has removed an entire lot of people by just stating they are "non-notable". That is only his opinion and not others. He did not discuss or allow other users to contribute/verify and just removed the names. Clearly, this page need sources and will be added over time. Wikipedia policy of having good faith should be exercised here.

I think he has some issues with similar pages of Canadian Universities. Obviously he would revert back to "his version" in no time. This obsessive behavior is not suited in Wikipedia. 219.77.171.34 (talk) 08:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

They're non-notable because they don't have Wikipedia articles, and the persons who added them failed to cite sources proving they are notable. The onus is on the person who adds them to verify notability and prove it to everyone else. GJ (talk) 15:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
This is Wikipedia where everyone contributes to articles. Removing them all won't solve the problem because nobody would know they ever existed. Just because whoever created this page has not provided references for every single person mentioned, it does not mean it should be removed. You said they are non notable just because they don't have Wikipedia articles. Well they will be notable when people start an article!!
Also, Wikipedia is not on a deadline. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:DEADLINE. See WP:NOEFFORT 203.218.213.127 (talk) 02:21, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
The onus is on the person adding the names in to cite sources and prove they are notable. Otherwise they can be removed. End of story. Don't start an argument with me, I'll find others to back me up. GJ (talk) 02:26, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

In this situation where you add a name that results in a redlink (even after searching for alternative names), you have a choice. You either write the article and demonstrate there that the person is notable, or you demonstrate notability in a reference, and wait for someone else to write the article. If you do not do that, how are we know that the redlink is not about a student who flunked out last year and has no notability whatsoever? --Bduke (talk) 02:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wait let me understand your statement Bduke. Are you in support for keeping the list or want it to be removed?
I thought I was clear. I am opposed to lists of this kind having redlinks unless there is a reference cited that clearly asserts notability. It would help of course if the reason for notability is given by the name as it was for several of the people being removed here, and that point established by the reference. E.g Joe Blogs, Member of Parliment, followed by ref that establishes that Joe was a M of P. We have to verify what we write. There can also be living person issues. So for this issue, for the items that the edit war is about, either write an article on them that gives notability or add a citation that asserts notablity. Just leaving a redlink with no cite is not acceptable. --Bduke (talk) 03:45, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Answer me this. What about the criteria of having good faith? And the fact Wikipedia is based on numerous people's contributions. Waiting for the person who created this page (i.e one person) to verify the links one by one will take a lot of time. Removing the list cannot possibly make things better. How will people know these people even existed? Sometimes common sense supersedes policy. 203.218.213.127 (talk) 04:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
The information is still in the history. It is not lost. The policy is clear. Notability has been challenged by the items being removed. To put them back it has to be verified that the people are McMaster people and that they are notable. Please read the policies. I agree with GJ and so it seems does Kmsiever below. I'm leaving this discussion now. It was only on my watch list because of my involvement with one of the notable people on this list and his article. --Bduke (talk) 05:40, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
User:GreenJoe apparently reverts to his own edit version just because he has a different point of view. I have valid reasoning why it should be kept but he just says its up to the person who started this page. This fundamentally opposes the contributing factor of wikipedia! Also I don't need to be threaten when you say "find other people to back me up". I'm more than welcome to listen to other people's POV. I also think there are many people who think differently than you do. The discussion is not the end. 203.218.213.127 (talk) 03:16, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
And I have valid reasoning for why it should remain out of the list. GJ (talk) 03:52, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Which makes no difference because I have my own reasoning. Don't pass judgment on others. Wait and see what other people have to say. Also bringing other people you know to "back you up" will just make the decision skewed. 203.218.213.127 (talk) 04:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree with what others have said. If a person is listed, the person should have a Wikipedia article, or the editor adding the person should provide a source. Either one establishes notability. Wikipedia is not a directory. See WP:NOT#DIR and WP:SAL#Lists of people for more information.--Kmsiever (talk) 05:19, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

John C Bell

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why does John C Bell need to be on the list, and where's the proof he's affiliated with McMaster? Me-123567-Me (talk) 03:37, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I added a source. :) Would you delete this whole article because it is completely unsourced, too? If you'd look John C Bell, you'd see where it says he received a degree at McMaster University. :) Finding sources isn't too difficult, and it is how to improve the content. To remove content without making sure that content is false (or unsourcable) means to risk losing helpful encyclopedic information. --PeaceNT (talk) 03:55, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Me-123567-Me and User:GreenJoe is the same person. Sockpuppets.

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Evidence:

Please don't make accusations you cannot backup. I am not this other individual you claim I am. GreenJoe 03:32, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
You want me to back it up? Just by looking at the edit times of user Me-123567-Me reverted the List of McMaster University people at 03:33 on 12 July 2008. See Evidence. User GreenJoe posted a warning template on the talk page of User Talk:203.218.216.163 at 03:32 12 July 2008. See Evidence How CONVENIENT that if you are not the same person, your posts are within ONE MINUTE APART? One cannot be dumber than this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.218.207.125 (talk) 01:21, 29 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Harold Innis public-domain library archives-canada.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  An image used in this article, File:Harold Innis public-domain library archives-canada.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:13, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:GS.Sunatori.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

An image used in this article, File:GS.Sunatori.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:10, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of McMaster University people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on List of McMaster University people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on List of McMaster University people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on List of McMaster University people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_McMaster_University_people&oldid=1207877988"