This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of oceans, seas, and bays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans articles
Other : add ISBNs and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from Aral Sea; check La Belle (ship) for GA status; improve citations or footnotes and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from MS Estonia
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I don't see the reason for the News Release tag. None of the language seems to me to be promotional.
If you disagree, please quote what you think is.
Bob (talk) 21:49, 6 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
I agree. Since I added the news release tag, an IP editor has removed the overtly promotional text. (Thanks for doing that!) For the difference, see here. Hallucegenia (talk) 08:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Reidnon-- the material you are adding is inadmissible for two reasons: 1) it is copied directly from liquidr.com, making it a copyright infringement; and 2) it is worded promotionally. If you would like to add information from the website to the wiki article, you must reword it in a neutral way, sticking to the facts and avoiding words like "groundbreaking". Rracecarr (talk) 18:51, 19 December 2012 (UTC)Reply