Talk:Lipošćak affair

Rating rationale

Sadenar40000, it would be helpful if you explained your rating rationale. Specifically, I believe the article warrants B-class, so could you please specify what's missing so your input could be actionable. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 13:28, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

If you are of the opinion that this is a B class, feel free to alter the rating I made by following the B class checklist, taking a second look at this article makes me think that the sourcing does warrant more of a B than a C class rating on this one, my excuses for any trouble made. Sadenar40000 (talk) 11:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. I will leave rating to others because WP:MILHIST requires B-class assessment be performed by editors other than principal authors. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:19, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

B class review

@Tomobe03: I assessed as B class. However, there seems to be a verb missing from the following sentence (Background sentence 1). Please review and fix. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 03:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

• "On 5–6 October, in the final weeks of the First World War, representatives of political parties representing the Croats, the Serbs, and the Slovenes living in Austria-Hungary the National Council of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs as a representative body with the aim of achieving independence from the empire."

@Djmaschek: Yes, one was missing. I added it now. Thanks for the assessment and the pointer.--Tomobe03 (talk) 07:32, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lipošćak affair/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 18:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi Tomobe03! I'll be reviewing this and the other two articles due to the ongoing GAN backlog. I will start the review a bit later. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 18:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Comments

General

• "(Afera Lipošćak)" → ({{lang-sh|Afera Lipošćak}})
• Link Slovene People's Party with Slovene People's Party (historical), the current link redirects to the modern reincarnation.
• Typo: abd → and.
• "The National Council resorted to conscription..." – missing space at the start of the sentence.
• Rest of the text is alright. It meets the criteria.
• Copyvios unlikely.
  • I believe I have addressed the above now.--Tomobe03 (talk) 17:08, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Images

• All are alright. I would prefer the addition of alt texts though.
  • I plan to move this to ACR later on (time permitting) and add alt text before that nomination.--Tomobe03 (talk) 17:07, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Sources

• All are alright.

On hold until this gets fixed. --Vacant0 (talk) 16:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Promoting. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:42, 8 January 2022 (UTC)