This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
After searching google books and google news archive, I can't find significant coverage of this company. The one source in the article that includes a discussion of the company here merely noted the the company built some highway bridges from 1914-1916, that its work was found to be of "decidely poor" workmanship by a state engineer, and that the company quickly went out of the bridge-building business. And the nomination forms indicate that the State Highway Dept. and other state engineers designed the bridges, and that Lincoln merely built the bridges (in some cases just the arches) per the design provided by the State. Without more/better sourcing, I have my doubts as to whether this one would pass a notability challenge. Cbl62 (talk) 04:53, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply