Talk:Letter of Pero Vaz de Caminha
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nasua Labi. Peer reviewers: Dnaugle21, JacksonWoo2021.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Letter of Pêro Vaz de Caminha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120210132601/http://www.ufrgs.br/proin/versao_1/caminha/index.html to http://www.ufrgs.br/proin/versao_1/caminha/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Letter of Pêro Vaz de Caminha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160418042209/http://blogs.uoregon.edu/summerinstitute2013/files/2013/05/The-Letter-of-Pero-Vaz-de-Caminha-21jx6cx.pdf to http://blogs.uoregon.edu/summerinstitute2013/files/2013/05/The-Letter-of-Pero-Vaz-de-Caminha-21jx6cx.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Proposed Edits edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I hope to make to following edits and expansions to article:
-Give more historical and biographical information about Pêro Vaz de Caminha
-Give more context into Portugals political state in the 1500's and how this affected their intentions in Brazil
-Add more translated sections from the letter and give contextual information
-How was the letter received by the Portuguese monarchy and how did this affect their future expeditions in Brazil
-Improve the coherence of the actual writing in the article
Possible Sources:
-https://www.jstor.org/stable/1316707?seq=4#page_scan_tab_contents
-https://books.google.com/books?id=9mR2QXrVEJIC&pg=RA1-PA312
-http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/sop.2011.54.4.593?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=16th&searchText=century&searchText=portugal&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D16th%2Bcentury%2Bportugal&refreqid=search%3A712fa5f5f7e76b1487645d88d1bd3906 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nasua Labi (talk • contribs) 02:49, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Reviewing Area edit
- It looks great but there is a serious lack of citations in the description. That is one of the core things that is needed.Dnaugle21 (talk) 20:58, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
So 1 month later, I'm back and here to review. I like how you included the original Portuguese and the English translation. If I recall correctly, for the Portuguese in the first paragraph, you should put in brackets to signify that it was the original. Better yet, this format: (Portuguese: Arvoredo Tanto, e tamanho, e tão basto, e de tanta folhagem, que não se pode calcular) then include the English translation. For the content section where you discuss the letter, citations from the text would be a good idea. Otherwise, keep up the good work.Dnaugle21 (talk) 22:55, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
"legumes" means vegetables, not legumes
2.45.70.150 (talk) 23:11, 19 November 2020 (UTC)