Talk:Leopold Mitrofanov

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Amputated version edit

There is also a commonly circulated version (see for example ChessBase) without the White rook and with the g2-knight already on e1. Now Krabbé doesn't like this one with the passive Ne1 (though it still plays a role in ensuring Black's final defeat), but Mitrofanov preferred this one to the Ng2-version. I think I can guess why; everyone loves the underdog and it is more satisfying to watch White push the odds dramatically in her favour, astonishing the spectators and taking Black's words from his mouth, when she is quite without pieces. Maybe the creator's preference should have priority here, but I'm ambivalent about it. Double sharp (talk) 16:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leopold Mitrofanov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply