Talk:Leonard Clark (poet)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by GeoffreyT2000 in topic Requested move 28 September 2018
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 28 September 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: pages moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
– No clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Flooded with them hundreds 14:39, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:OVERPRECISION. There is no other article on WP about anyone else named Leonard Clark. Station1 (talk) 00:58, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support: Well, now there is another such article, created less than a day ago! Maybe we should put the dab page at the base name for a while and see which one is more popular in 6 months. There are other topics listed as well, but they all seem rather minor. The poet's article gets about 9 views per day, which is not so much. Much of that was concentrated in December through April for some reason – only 6 views per day in the last 90 days. —BarrelProof (talk) 02:32, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Maybe. Or we could just leave it as a WP:TWODABS situation for 6 months and then look. Are we sure the "explorer" is notable? There are no sources other than an author profile. Although the poet doesn't have any sources either. Station1 (talk) 05:59, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support: Well, now there is another such article, created less than a day ago! Maybe we should put the dab page at the base name for a while and see which one is more popular in 6 months. There are other topics listed as well, but they all seem rather minor. The poet's article gets about 9 views per day, which is not so much. Much of that was concentrated in December through April for some reason – only 6 views per day in the last 90 days. —BarrelProof (talk) 02:32, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support. Three people by this name with articles, none of them WP:PTOPIC. Narky Blert (talk) 06:00, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Who is the third? Station1 (talk) 05:59, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- Doesn't means only 2 articles are relevant because only 2 of them have articles. More articles of same name can be created. Lorstaking (talk) 03:58, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Support Obviously not a primary topic. More articles exists that have same name and more articles can be created. Lorstaking (talk) 03:58, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Weak support Views [[1]] don't show a clear PT between the 2 articles but as the other is newly created its difficult to tell. However this isn't a WP:2DABS situation as there are others. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:34, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.