| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Maine may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
BLP Issues edit
Okay, there are a lot of problems here, mainly involving WP:BLP.
The easiest problem to deal with is that I don't think Issue Hawk is a reliable source, especially not for a BLP, and so I've removed it.
More complex is the characterization of Lockman as being "pro-rape". There was a statement in the article attributed to him where he said "why shouldn't a man be free to use his superior strength to force himself on a woman?" Yes, it's a horrid argument, and a nonsensical comparison, but since he was comparing rape to abortion, which he is opposed to, his statement cannot be taken as a literal endorsement of rape. Using this statement as a rationale for describing him as "pro rape" is not acceptable.
There's more to it, as well: The statement is attributed to a editorial letter published in a local newspaper in 1995.[1] That's not a WP:RS, and while the quote has been republished in a few other places, there's no clear indication given where he originally wrote the statement. As far as I can see, he hasn't even confirmed that he did write this. At the very least, any mention of the quote needs to make that perfectly clear.
Wikipedia isn't a WP:SOAPBOX. Cherry-picking his most outrageous quotes in series, and deliberately phrasing things to make this person look bad are violations of Wikipedia's policies. Grayfell (talk) 23:00, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- It also isn't hide all a politicians worst moments. Motheradverts (talk) 15:36, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Motheradverts: You're responding to a comment I made nine years ago, when the article looked different from how it does now. If you have a proposal for how to improve the current article, make it. Grayfell (talk) 21:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
response to blp issues edit
Why did you take out the criminal behavior part of the title? Not paying state or federal income taxes is a crime, as is encouraging others to do the same. A lot of people have gone to prison for that. You substituted in the words tax protesting, but people can protest in ways that don't involve breaking the law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiminyjillickers (talk • contribs) 23:30, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- It's about clarity and neutrality. I'm sure most reliable sources would agree that tax protesting is illegal, but simply saying that he was performing criminal activity without any further explanation is loaded. "Tax protester" is a specific label that has a clear and narrow meaning, which we can (and do) wikilink for additional context. "Criminal" is a broad term which could imply almost anything, and is lurid, but not very informative. WP:LABELs like that should be avoided when more specific terms can easily be substituted. Grayfell (talk) 23:49, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
BLP source is probably not adequate edit
Iffy source - I am removing the information related to this source. It is quoting another article, which I wasn't able to find the information in the quoted article. We need a stronger source for this type of BLP. --VVikingTalkEdits 16:14, 15 September 2018 (UTC)