Talk:LaToya Cantrell
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 July 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Early life and education edit
The claim of executive management training at Harvard looks to be a puff piece out of her political resume, perhaps relating to a two day seminar or similar, thus non-encyclopedic. An independent source and the extent of such training should be required, otherwise, the sentence should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.30.9.252 (talk) 23:46, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:11, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Improper Edits and Reversals edit
Is there a way to include a Controversies section that meets Wikipedia standards? Speaking from a neutral point of view, it is not possible to discuss Cantrell's mayoral administration without including objective facts about her serial scandals and the subsequent recall effort. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:546B:DC00:B030:AD55:88B0:8424 (talk) 17:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Yes this not neutral article desperately needs coverage of the multiple controversies she has faced. Taquim (talk) 01:44, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 9 May 2023 edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There should be mention of this investigative piece that found Mayor Cantrell was spending hours alone in a city apartment with a security protection officer who was being paid with city funds.
https://www.fox8live.com/video/2022/11/10/zurik-investigation-outside-office/ 38.13.32.146 (talk) 18:45, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Lightoil (talk) 04:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}