Talk:Konecranes

Currency unit

MEUR is a very creative invention of a new currency symbol (stands probably for "million Euro"). I would like to change it, but I am unsure about the Wikipedia standards. Kwally (talk) 06:09, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Changing the style of the article

Restocking added a note on Konecranes article on May 2015 about saying that "This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic content written from a neutral point of view". The article has been edited a lot since that and now I and the Konecranes folks would like to rewrite the article so that we can get rid of that warning. Any ideas where to start? I am pinging here users who have edited the page during the past years (Juskevich, A1krosti, Pollae, Xibaokiina, Nouill, Manandurge, ButtonwoodTree, Nosebagbear, Djflem, Saralicia, IceKarma) so that you will notice my question. And yes, I am doing this for this on behalf of Konecranes.--Jjanhone (talk) 09:10, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

It is my understanding that Konecranes should not be editing its own article. Am I incorrect? Restocking (talk) 12:13, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Companies can edit articles if they follow Wikipedia principles and inform about their edits. See [4]. But you did not answer my question about the "content that sounds like ads". What should be removed? --Jjanhone (talk) 10:41, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Restocking removed the tag (thanks!) but Hayman30 added it back. Why? Can you tell me what should be changed to get it permanently removed? --Jjanhone (talk) 10:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

As Restocking who had added the tag has now removed it and Hayman30 who have added it back has not told reasons for that I have removed the tag. If someone addeds it back again I hope to get some kind of rationale behind the decision. Thanks! --Jjanhone (talk) 09:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed Merger of this article and Demag

I propose that Demag be merged into Konecranes. The two companies have merged and they both have large articles that could be condensed. Any input, especially from users not employed by the companies, is appreciated. Restocking (talk) 14:04, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Konecranes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130417100831/http://www.konecranes.com/investors/corporate-governance/group-management/group-executive-board/pekka-lundmark to http://www.konecranes.com/investors/corporate-governance/group-management/group-executive-board/pekka-lundmark/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130918011414/http://www.portstrategy.com/news101/products-and-services/remote-monitoring-konecranes-style to http://www.portstrategy.com/news101/products-and-services/remote-monitoring-konecranes-style
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150620091012/http://www.radicaldesignweek.com/index.php/archives/294 to http://www.radicaldesignweek.com/index.php/archives/294
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140324140952/http://www.red-dot-21.com/products/agilon-material-management-solution-22539 to http://www.red-dot-21.com/products/agilon-material-management-solution-22539

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Paid contributions tag

A paid editor made contributions to this article, and has disclosed that fact on this page, therefore the {{paid contributions}} is a matter of fact and does not require discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

According to the policy "if you place the Paid tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article." As a paid editor I'm not allowed to remove the tag myself, but if any volunteer editor thinks that the neutral point of view of the article is ok, they are free to remove the tag as told in the Template:Paid contributions instructions: "If you do not start this discussion, then any editor is justified in removing the tag without warning."Jjanhone (talk) 16:48, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Edit request: adding the Awards section back

Last year a user removed a chapter about awards/recognition that had been referenced with quality sources. Could it be added partly back? See my suggestion below. Jjanhone (talk) 07:00, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Original chapter Awards:

RTG aka Rubber tyred gantry crane by Konecranes in Finnish factory

• In 2010 Konecranes’ new RFID based NearGuard System for heavy lift trucks and reach stackers won the IMHX Design 4 Safety award in the UK.(ref name="KC_His"/)
• In 2011 the chief information officer of Konecranes, Antti Koskelin, was Finland's seventh CIO of the Year. He was seen as a "capable interpreter between IT and business" and his social and networking skills were commended.(ref name="Tivi20110513">"Konecranesin Antti Koskelin on Vuoden CIO". Tietoviikko. Retrieved 2013-04-02.</ref)
• In 2011 Konecranes UK Ltd won a gold medal in the health and safety competition organized by the prestigious RoSPA (ref name="KC_Rospa">"Konecranes UK Ltd wins RoSPA Gold award for Health and Safety". Konecranes. Retrieved 2013-04-02.</ref)
• Konecranes’ "Smarter Cabin" crane cabin won the prestigious Finnish Fennia Prize in 2012. Thanks to the 60 percent larger window area the smarter cabin gives the driver remarkably improved visibility. The better visibility was ensured by studying the sight lines from the operator's chair to the critical working areas in close co-operation with Konecranes' customers. The observers were not only observed but also interviewed. The Fennia Prize is a design competition organized by Design Forum Finland and Festia Group for companies producing designed goods or applying design in their operations.(ref name="rdw20120607">"Konecranes' Smarter Cabin Wins Award". Radical Design week. Archived from the original on 2015-06-20. Retrieved 2013-04-02.</ref)
• In March 2013 Konecranes got the famous Red Dot award, "Product design 2013", for the design quality of Konecranes’ multibranded electric chain hoist series launched a year before. The winning product series included identities for the Konecranes brand and its brands like Verlinde, SWF, R&M, and STAHL CraneSystems.(ref name="gnw20130318">"Konecranes awarded in Red Dot, one of the most internationally acclaimed design competitions". Globenewswire. Retrieved 2013-04-02.</ref)
• In January 2014, Agilon material handling system received Fennia Prize Honorary Mention 2014.(ref>"Fennia Prize 2014". Design Forum Finland. Retrieved 2014-03-27.</ref) In March 2014, Konecranes received Red Dot award, "Product design 2014", for the design quality of the Agilon material management solution. The patented Agilon materials inventory and management system can be used for storing large sum of different components, and it allows real-time information on the components to be shared with various parties in the supply chain.(ref>"KONECRANES AGILON RECEIVED RED DOT AWARD: PRODUCT DESIGN 2014". Euroinvestor. Retrieved 2014-03-24.</ref)(ref>Tervola, Janne. "Konecranesin materiaalihallintapalvelu voitti Red Dot -muotoilupalkinnon". Tekniikkatalous (in Finnish). Retrieved 2020-05-11.</ref)
• In 2020, as part of the Fennia Prize Design Competition, Konecranes won the IPR Excellence prize from the Finnish Patent and Registration Office for the patents and model rights of the C-series chain hoist and S-Series overhead crane. The S-series also received honorable mention in the design competition.(ref>"Konecranesin uusille tuotteille myönnettiin Fennia Prize -palkinto". Hämeen Sanomat (in Finnish). Retrieved 2020-05-11.</ref)

New (shorter) chapter Recognitions:

RTG aka Rubber tyred gantry crane by Konecranes in Finnish factory

• In 2010 Konecranes’ new RFID based NearGuard System for heavy lift trucks and reach stackers won the IMHX Design 4 Safety award in the UK.(ref name="KC_His"/)
• In 2011 the chief information officer of Konecranes, Antti Koskelin, was chosen as CIO of the Year in Finland.(ref name="Tivi20110513">"Konecranesin Antti Koskelin on Vuoden CIO". Tietoviikko. Retrieved 2013-04-02.</ref)
• In 2012 Konecranes’ "Smarter Cabin" crane cabin won the prestigious Finnish Fennia Prize from Design Forum Finland and Festia Group.(ref name="rdw20120607">"Konecranes' Smarter Cabin Wins Award". Radical Design week. Archived from the original on 2015-06-20. Retrieved 2013-04-02.</ref)
• In 2013 Konecranes got Red Dot award, "Product design 2013", for the design quality of Konecranes’ multibranded electric chain hoist series.(ref>Morgan, James (2014-12-15). "Konecranes launches CLX chain hoist in Middle East". Construction Week. Retrieved 2021-10-12.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)</ref)(ref>"Konecranes' CLX electric chain hoist received Special Mention in 2015 German Design Award". Portnews. Retrieved 2021-10-12.</ref)(ref>"Konecranes Agilon received Red Dot Award: Product Design 2014 | Corporate press releases". Konecranes. Retrieved 2021-10-12.</ref)
• In March 2014, Konecranes received Red Dot award, "Product design 2014", for the design quality of the Agilon material management product.(ref>Tervola, Janne. "Konecranesin materiaalihallintapalvelu voitti Red Dot -muotoilupalkinnon". Tekniikkatalous (in Finnish). Retrieved 2020-05-11.</ref)
• In 2020 Konecranes won the IPR Excellence prize from the Finnish Patent and Registration Office for the patents and model rights of the C-series chain hoist and S-Series overhead crane.(ref>"Konecranesin uusille tuotteille myönnettiin Fennia Prize -palkinto". Hämeen Sanomat (in Finnish). Retrieved 2020-05-11.</ref)

 Not done for now: First, the raw text pasted in is not helpful; please cite references with the proper WP:Citation templates, which can be done with tools in the editor interface. Second, in general, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate list, nor is it a platform for promotion (See WP:NOT, WP:PROMO). For awards, a self-citation is not at all sufficient: the award needs to be noteworthy in its own right, which typically means a reliable, independent source has covered the award to company. That excludes things like press releases, for example. Feel free to resubmit your request with the proper formatting and with the guidelines linked above in mind. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 03:16, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Article assessment

Greetings, For this article I changed from Class-stub to Class-start. I added one CN tag, needed to verify year the business listed on the stock exchange. Also, there are numerous Press Release citations which are from the company website, and not independent reliable sources. For the section Konecranes and Cargotec (2020-2022), the word informed is used multiple times, and the grammatical usage is confusing. Try other words to clarify the meaning. The Business operations section resembles advertising vs. encyclopedia style. The Rater ORES prediction tool rates as Class-C, however for the reasons I stated, Class-start is sufficient for now. Overall the article is well written, just needs improvement. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 14:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC)